Talk:Fugging, Upper Austria/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Fugging, Upper Austria. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Quote about road signs
I notice that this quote: "Schmidtberger, whilst not disclosing what other options were on the table, stated "What they are, I am not at liberty to disclose, but we will not stand for the Fucking signs being removed. It may be very amusing for you British, but Fucking is simply Fucking to us. What is this big Fucking joke? It is puerile."[13]" is cited from a non-online source. I highly doubt this is exactly what he said - it seems too hilarious - can someone try and verify the quote? 87.194.214.89 (talk) 09:01, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
- That was my thought too. Does it help th'article t'have it in there? If not, we can just take it down as suspect until it is confirmed. --Signor Giuseppe (talk) 15:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- I added an online news source. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:22, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
The quote is stupid. I don't think it matters if it's factual or not, I think that just having it on the page makes it look less like Wikipedia and more like Uncyclopedia. And on the issue of whether it's real or not, the only article about it is some vague online blog-ish thing. Enough said... Santesteband (talk) 06:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Budget
From the article: Most of Fucking's budget is spent on replacing the stolen signs. - Isn't that an exaggeration? Town budgets are not that low nowadays, there is a lot to be paid from them. Andre Engels 12:55, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- I checked on the internet, and it seems to be an exaggeration indeed. It seems to come from a statement by the village's mayor that much (rather than most) of the village's budget is spent on this. They also give more precise numbers: The signs are stolen on a rate of slightly more than one sign a month, and they cost "several hundred dollars" apiece. Andre Engels 13:03, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- The actual flaw in the story is that Fucking is just a village, which belongs to the municipality of Tarsdorf. It doesn't have its own mayor, administration or budget. Martg76 15:16, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- Who would want to be the mayor anyway?? "Hello my name is Siegfried Kuntz I am the Fucking mayor, we do not have a tour guide so you will have to walk around Fucking yourself"
Dale Ireland (talk) 03:09, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Dale, not as cleaver as you think. A better pun would be "Man, that is one Fucking small budget if they can't afford to replace the signs!" Seriously.
72.60.140.175 (talk) 02:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- That one didn't even make sense. Dale's was great. 76.66.97.2 (talk) 13:31, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- I'd rather be the mayor of Fucking than be an ignorant and immature xenophobic troll. -- 98.108.198.118 (talk) 21:11, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Pronunciation guide
The pronunciation guide still looks very odd to me ( ˈfʊkɪŋ]), there has to be a more elegant way to do this? I'm using Mozilla. Mark Richards 02:23, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- What about this: »Fucking /ˈfʊkɪŋ/ is a small settlement...« This is the shortest and most elegant way. Using the right browser isn't enough; install the fonts! (
apt-get install defoma xfonts-intl-phontetic
) — Hokanomono 08:01, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- I still can't make sense of that, and don't think that we should be designing pages that can't be read without downloading special fonts. Sorry! Mark Richards 16:12, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- We do that regularly, though. See Japan or South Korea or Pythagoras or Zion or Osama bin Laden. — mendel ☎ 16:16, Apr 2, 2004 (UTC)
- Pythagoras, Zion and Osama bin Laden look ok, but Japan and South Korea look messed up. If it's actually another language then that's one thing, and not having those language fonts included are going to mess it up, but why generate more of these cases just for pronunciation, which we can do without it? It just looks ugly, and I bet I'm not the only one who doesn't have these fonts. Mark Richards 16:34, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- I have to agree 100%. There is absolutley no point in putting in this pronunciation guide if it is unreadable and utterly useless for the majority of readers (which includes me) Mintguy (T) 18:12, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC) BTW I can read Japan and South Korea fine, because I have loaded all the standard international fonts using Microsoft Windows update . I have no idea what font is being used for this pronunciation guide, but it isn't part of the standard package Mintguy (T) 18:14, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- I don't understand the problem at all. Please, can you show me a screenshot of it? You don't have to pronounce it correctly, but why not provide information to those who want it? IPA is the best tool for that purpose and it's what dictionaries use, worldwide. IPA glyphs are part of the Unicode standard. Tell MS that at least you want to be able to read wikipedia for the money you pay them. — Hokanomono 22:05, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Here:
Do you seriously expect M$ to take notice of this. The problem is you are using a non-standard font, that the majority of people, even those who have loaded international fonts like myself cannot read. How the hell am I supposed to know what font to load to read this? Mintguy (T) 22:50, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- It would be nice if we could keep uncommon fonts etc to places where they are strictly necessary, for backwards browser compatability if nothing else. I would hazard a guess that many people coming here do not have these fonts installed, and there is no explanation on the main page that you may need them to make sense of the content - it just looks like a rendering error if you don't know what's going on. Thanks! Mark Richards 23:23, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Would it be apropos to mention it displays perfectly in Mozilla Firefox, on Windows NT 4 and on FreeBSD, and also to point out that MS has already declared IE abandonware? We can hardly freeze the web at late 2001, when IE6 came out - David Gerard 23:29, Apr 2, 2004 (UTC)
A screencap of Mac OS X using Safari:
--Cantus 23:37, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
It's a font thing, not a browser thing. Many people do not like to load extra fonts, for the very good reason that the more fonts you load, the slower and less stable your system gets. Non-standard fonts are a very good thing to avoid wherever you can. Tannin
- You sure it's a font thing? That's Firefox onto a default install of NT 4. - David Gerard 23:37, Apr 2, 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for the screenshot. I don't care too much about MS ;-) (However, I hope someday MS will consider IPA worth being added to their default fonts.) (See also Unicode)
I heard about html code that might help. Can you read the following?
- /ˈfʊkɪŋ/
Here is my screenshot:
— Hokanomono 23:33, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Sorry, I can't read that. I get " /ˈfʊkɪŋ/ ". I am using Mozilla on Windows 98. Mark Richards 23:35, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- You may not be able to read it, but it cut'n'pasted as the proper characters when you put it there just now, so your browser understands it but doesn't have the font to hand ... - David Gerard 23:44, Apr 2, 2004 (UTC)
- I'm sure it would be appropriate, I hate M$, don't use IE etc etc, but a lot of the world still does use it, and we still have a lot of things (like the 32k page thing) that are for backwards compatability. It just seems like there are easier ways to indicate pronunciation than asking most users to install new fonts. Perhaps I'm very old fashioned. ;) Mark Richards 23:34, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I have just emailed the wikien-l mailing list asking for guidance on this issue, and referring people to this talk page - David Gerard 23:45, Apr 2, 2004 (UTC)
- Great - also, so far as I can determine, we are recommending that it is pronounced like 'looking' - isn't it more like 'luck-ing'? Am I missing something? Thanks! Mark Richards 00:25, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- I think it is pronounced more like 'look' than 'luck'. I speak German, but I don't know anybody from Fucking. In German u is almost always pronounced similar 'oo' as in 'look'. (If you want to learn more about it, see German pronunciation#Short Vowels.) — Hokanomono 07:52, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- In Britain at least, looking is pronounced in a wide variety of ways. In RP the 'oo' sound is clipped (can't think of a suitable example perhaps foot) whilst in some parts of the north of England the "oo" sound in looking and cooking is drawn out as in the word "woo" or "boot". I believe that this is how Fucking is pronounced. Mintguy (T)
- It seems I don't know how to pronounce english :( Thanks for the explaination. IPA is useful. — Hokanomono 09:19, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- I don't see any particular problem with the article as it is. SAMPA is there for the majority of people like me who don't have an IPA font. I don't think it's particularly necessary to have the IPA as well, but I wouldn't remove it. How about shuffling it around so most people see a valid pronunciation guide before a bunch of boxes?
- I took out "FOO-king". Three pronunciation guides is a bit excessive. Note, in my example I've changed the SAMPA link to a more useful one. But, I don't have any real problem with the article as it is, this is just a suggestion. I'm a bit disturbed by all the browser/OS snobbery in this discussion, think of all the people using workplace/school computers who don't have the right to change their systems by downloading fonts and alternative browsers. fabiform | talk 11:09, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Great. I support your suggestion. — Hokanomono | talk ~~
I predeict tat there will be a stream of people who will be confused by the boxes and will either come here querying it or will just edit it out of the article. Mintguy (T)
- Most users see boxes in articles about Chinise/Japanese/Russian etc subjects, where names are given in the original language. They don't edit those out. fabiform | talk 10:13, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Quick solution to the font problem: Set your font to Arial Unicode.
The WikiEN-L post saying so is here. This post outlines broader solutions which really belong in the MediaWiki code itself.
However, if it's a matter as simple as selecting Arial Unicode, I see no reason not to continue using IPA symbols just as if they were proper Unicode entities. Which they are. - David Gerard 08:42, Apr 4, 2004 (UTC)
- General information about the font. Supplied with Microsoft Office 2000, FrontPage 2000, Office XP and Publisher 2002 [1] - that page has other downloadable Unicode fonts for Windows. Any respectable Unicode font should have these characters. Here is another place to download something called "Arial Unicode" - I would be interested to know if this is sufficiently complete. (This was a few minutes' work with Google.) - David Gerard 12:30, Apr 4, 2004 (UTC)
- I don't think that Arial Unicode includes the IPA as it's not listed under the ranges (whereas it's listed on the Arial Unicode MS page). I have downloaded a unicode font which includes the IPA, but it was rough and ready, and not what I want for my default font. fabiform | talk 14:06, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- What if you just install the font, but don't set it as your default font. Shouldn't the browser automatically manage to use the font containing the characters it needs? — Hokanomono 18:03, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Well, that seemed to be the case with some of the foreign alphabets (Russian, Chinese etc) after I installed the first unicode font and then switched back to Times New Roman as my default (i.e these still displayed OK). But it didn't work with the IPA, those characters became boxes again. I think it may be grouped in with other Latin characters or something. I don't really know though. fabiform | talk 18:27, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Please try again, i set the font for the IPA string. — Hokanomono 20:20, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- That worked for me and I've never downloaded any fonts (Using IE on WinXP). Rmhermen 20:33, Apr 4, 2004 (UTC)
- Please try again, i set the font for the IPA string. — Hokanomono 20:20, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- That looks great! Thanks a lot folks, Mark Richards 15:36, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I thought the article was just another piece of vandalism when I found it. It was actually a real place name but someone had removed all the text, so now I've reinstated the text and had a little talk to them. Scott Gall 04:46, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Bitte - nicht so schnell
The sign in the picture is particularly funny in combination with the children saying "Bitte - nicht so schnell". Do I have a dirty mind because of the mental picture it gives me? =) — JIP | Talk 10:08, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
What happened to the "Bitte - nict so schnell" sign? Is the combination of "Please, not so fast!" with "Fucking" even too much for Austrians? Rlquall 00:01, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- What do you mean with "even too much for Austrians"? ;p —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 12:15, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- A photo of that sign (or one like it) can be found here (warning: site has popunder ads). --anon. 162.83.145.173 (talk) 17:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
"...(or possibly as more obscene as it is almost never used figuratively), is ficken."
I don't see the link between figurative use & degree of obscenity. Any thoughts?
- I think the difference is what the obscene word is intended to mean. Foe example: "Your sister is so ugly I wouldn't fuck her if she paid me for it" is literal obscenity but "Don't fuck with me, boy, I'm an expert" is figurative obscenity. — JIP | Talk 21:02, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Just an observation:
If the metal traffic sign keeps getting stolen, why not replace it with masonry or concrete? Bobak 00:07, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- this is not allowed by law in austria -193.171.251.179 11:23, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
They have just set the signs in concrete, because 24 were stolen.--andreasegde (talk) 22:25, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Just a thought
r the inhabitants of this place called fuckers
- [place witty retort here] -- Bobak 19:45, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
- I believe they would be called "Fuckingers" Laplie 14:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- Rather Fuckinger, singular and plural. —Nightstallion (?) 10:49, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- The national passtime in the US is baseball. What do the locals there like to do for fun?108.23.147.17 (talk)
- Rather Fuckinger, singular and plural. —Nightstallion (?) 10:49, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- I believe they would be called "Fuckingers" Laplie 14:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Another town nearby
Looking at a map of the region, there is also a nearby town called "Tittmoning". Perhaps that should be mentioned in the article too. --Salsa man 20:23, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
There's also a town named "Windpassing" in Austria. I heard there's a place called "Wank am see", "Petting". "Vomitville", etc. in Austria too.
- I'm willing to believe the first three, but I'm not buying "Vomitville." Freshacconci 22:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- For the record, there's one called Kotzdorf (which means 'vomit village' in English). -- Marcika (talk) 02:01, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
There is a little town in Saskatchewan, Canada called Climax.....perhaps a sister community?? (1 Sep 07) mg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.198.87.176 (talk) 15:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
There are many jokes about the name of the town of Intercourse, Pennsylvania, including the suggestion that it form a sister city relationship with Fucking, Austria. To boot, there is a Pussy, France and a Clit, Romania and a Little Dicks, Scotland. Tim129.93.65.41 (talk) 03:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
What do you call citizens of this town?
Fucking Australians. The Wookieepedian 06:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Correction: Fucking Austrians. --Howard the Duck 14:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Nah, he was correct before. oTHErONE (Contribs) 07:26, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- F***. lol --Howard the Duck 11:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- I was trying to make a lame joke or something... oTHErONE (Contribs) 01:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- F***. lol --Howard the Duck 11:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Nah, he was correct before. oTHErONE (Contribs) 07:26, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- The citiziens are called "Fuckinger" (pronouncation of the "u" like the "u" in "put"). --84.73.21.242 18:38, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- * I would prefer the term 'Fuckers'! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.70.235.8 (talk) 21:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
- Guys we better stop before this gets too much attention and ends up getting deleted.203.218.26.240 14:29, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
I agree with calling them fuckers, alternatives could be fuckwits or fuckheads. Seriously, what a stupid fucking name for a place!YourPTR! 14:50, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- When a place was named way before Modern English was invented...88.105.78.200 (talk) 19:08, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Fuckingites. 68.149.173.28 (talk) 02:40, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
What are you people, 12 years old? -- 98.108.198.118 (talk) 21:16, 22 January 2012 (UTC) Hehe... you said people... wait, that didn't make any sense --82.113.98.153 (talk) 21:16, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Sign photo
Y'know, if someone could get a high res photo of the town sign, I can all but guarantee it would probably be a shoo-in for featured picture. Badbilltucker 22:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Is the current picture of the old sign or the new, theft-proofed one? It might be interesting to have pictures of both. 83.95.110.236 22:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
POV complaint
The focus of this article on the humorous associations of the name for English-speakers is an appalling example of abusing one culture by viewing it through the perspective of another. Some of the overtly racist remarks above show that an extremely problematic attitude lies behind this. If it is true (and can be verified) that loutish behaviour by visiting English-speakers have proved a problem for the people of this village, then I suppose that needs to be mentioned as a footnote somewhere, but at present the reader has the impression that the most important thing about this place is the amusement its name causes when viewed through English eyes, and that is entirely unacceptable. --Doric Loon 10:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
OK, I have now changed this, and I would ask you please not to revert it. Against my better judgment, I've left the references, which will allow easy access to the tabloid treatment of this, and I've left the cross-reference to "fuck" in case anyone doesn't understand the potential for punning. That's already more than is justified in an article on the village. If you really want to write this stuff up in full and sordid detail, I suggest you start a page on racist humour, and add a cross-reference from here to there. --Doric Loon 10:17, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Relax, dude. I understand where you are coming from, we do have to watch out for our biases, and I think most of your edit is fine. However, you have to remember that a lot of attention has been focused on this place because of the associations of its name for English speakers. I think it's safe to say that a large proportion of people who are familiar with the village are so only because of the "funny name". It may be infantile humour, but Wikipedia cannot simply ignore it or minimise it. — Matt Crypto 10:43, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Well, Matt, I've nothing against infantile humour (can be pretty earthy myself when I'm in the mood) but it's a different matter altogether when the humour is at another culture's expense. Of course I agree with you that if there's an issue out there in the world, Wiki has to report it, which is why I didn't remove all trace of the issue. But it should be handled carefully: the remarks about "fucking Austrians" further up this page make it clear that some people working here are enjoying this for the wrong reasons. IF we mention that some people find the name amusing, we need also to mention that others see in this amusement serious issues of inter-cultural respect. And it should be kept brief: at most it should be a footnote to an article on the place, and the main body of the article should have the usual data (history, maps, coats of arms, population statistics, administration, whatever) which other articles on central European places have, to show we are serious about reporting the place first and foremost as the community it is. --Doric Loon 11:36, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I'll have to disagree. We report on human knowledge, and we have to weight our report based on what place the topic has in human knowledge. Are there lots of people in the world protesting about inter-cultural respect with regards to Fucking, Austria? Maybe there should be, but I don't think there are, so we cannot include it. We can agree that Fucking is famous outside of its locality solely because of its name. A good article will reflect that, and we cannot make it just a footnote. You may think that Anglocentric and disrespectful of other people's cultures, but I see that as an inescapable property of the knowledge we're documenting, and not Wikipedia's responsibility. — Matt Crypto 11:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Well yes, there ARE people apart from me who find this disrespectful and offensive - the articles cited at the bottom of the page indicate pretty well that the local population don't like this. You won't find equal numbers if you pit the population of Fucking against the population of the English-speaking world, but that is not the point when we are talking about balance. As for your idea that the flippant way this is dealt with in the article is an "inescapable property of the knowledge", that is clearly nonsense, since I would deal with it differently and can therefore escape! (And I never suggested we don't mention the issue, remember!) My problem is with the sensationalist approach, and that is a property of the reporting, and absolutely Wikipedia's responsibility. --Doric Loon 13:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- It's not "clearly nonsense" if the way you would deal with it is incorrect. — Matt Crypto 13:48, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Doric, you are a complete loon! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.243.60.11 (talk) 01:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC) LOOOOOOL very nice. lolol Barerandom (talk) 15:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Doric no offense, but sometimes we need to just take a laxative and relax. If it weren't for the name its likely there would be no Wiki at all for the town, or if so it would receive very few hits. So lets all stop being so Fucking obesssed. There are bigger problems both here on Wiki and the world at large! P.S. If I had the money I'd move to Austria and start a newspaper there, just so I could call it the Fucking News!Sector001 (talk) 05:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Doric is right and you're in violation of WP policy. -- 98.108.198.118 (talk) 21:20, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
- Doric no offense, but sometimes we need to just take a laxative and relax. If it weren't for the name its likely there would be no Wiki at all for the town, or if so it would receive very few hits. So lets all stop being so Fucking obesssed. There are bigger problems both here on Wiki and the world at large! P.S. If I had the money I'd move to Austria and start a newspaper there, just so I could call it the Fucking News!Sector001 (talk) 05:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
The word "FUCK" has entered the European vocabulary universally. It crosses all borders and is accepted as a curse as it's intended in English.
The word "FUCK" is part of the European vocabulary and probably just about everywhere in the world and is understood as a curse just as it's intended in English. The spread of the use of the word is probably due to it's copious use in American films which are distributed all over the world. The smartest thing the residents of Fucking, Austria cold do is to capatilze on the name and sell all manner of goods (including signs)with their official name on them. If they can't accept the change of the common vocabulary with good nature (and become famous n their own rite), their only alternative is to change their name. 1Z JEEPN 16:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hell yeah! They should cash in on it! I can see it now... postcards and t-shirts reading "Greetings from Fucking Austria!" --Candy-Panda 04:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- I think that the funniest would be (e.g.) "A friend of mine went to Austria and all I got was this [picture of Fucking sign] T-shirt". :D 193.122.47.170 16:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- It's only a tiny village, remember. But yes, of course, this article is heavily weighted towards its name and probably wouldn't even exist otherwise.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 21:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hate to necro this thread, but I have to agree. ZtObOr 02:27, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
This Wikipedia talk page is not the place for pontificating on what people in villages in Austria should do. -- 98.108.198.118 (talk) 21:22, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
names to be mentioned
dildo, USA
dildo, labrador, canada the original dildo! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.51.228.96 (talk) 01:29, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Tittybong, Australia
Wherethefuckarewe, Australia
Inaloo, Australia
dickwood drive, wich goes into fanny bay, Australia
i know they are not austrain but i find them funy--Chinflaps 01:51, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Also worth mentioningL Intercourse (Pennsylvania, USA), Condom in France. itsme (talk) 20:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
suffix ing
I thought the primary meaning of the suffix ing was descendant, rather than people. —Tamfang 08:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Honorable Mention
noting the other odd town names, i think one that is in line very specifically with the name of this town that should be mentioned is Intercourse, Pennsylvania. i'll add it in, if anyone has objections to it, by all means, feel free to remove it.
- never mind, after reading the other mentioned names and their origins (and specifically because they're other languages with specific connotations in english) i decided against adding intercourse.
This is weasely
"A similar phenomenon can be attributed to Bavarian places such as Kissing and Petting, although less outside attention is paid due to less obscene names" - This line implicitly assumes that the name of the town in question is obscene, which is an apalling example of bias by English speaking members. Amit 03:25, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
- Whatever language you're using here is remarkably similar to English. -- Craigtalbert 14:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Proposed pictures
I recently visited Fucking and took some pictures. For some strange reason, I cannot find the picture I took of the entry sign by itself. It's possible I was dehydrated and simply forgot.
Please go to my picassa/google web album and vote for which pics you'd like to see here. Leave comments here.
These are licensed to Google, but I have the originals which I will GPL upon uploading here (I do hope that works). --Otheus 17:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fucking marvellous. Nice one.--andreasegde (talk) 22:40, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
The redirect fucking is being discussed.
Click here to join the discussion. TheBlazikenMaster 13:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
P.s. This message has been added to five pages related to this term so there will be real discussion. TheBlazikenMaster 13:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Reverse
Are that and places that are like this in reverse. I.e. that are innocuous in English but something extremely rude in another language? I'm sure there must be dozens. Jooler 15:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- I agree .
- Words & names that are innocent in one language maybe volger in another and in reverse .
- And you most probably find examples in any 2 language pairs .Richardson j 04:46, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- How about Mist, Oregon? "Mist" means "crap" in German. --188.104.139.25 (talk) 23:17, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
How far?
In "half an hour's ride from Petting in Bavaria", is that at normal horse speed, or maximum-driven horse speed, or bicycle speed, or motorcycle speed, or what? Best state distance in kilometers or miles. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:49, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- It's in the velocity of the airspeed of an unladen swallow. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.114.225.181 (talk) 00:49, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Is that an African swallow or a European swallow?67.150.121.10 (talk) 03:57, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- It's a fucking swallow from Fucking that doesn't fucking swallow, if you get my meaning. How far can you hop when you're fucking fucking all the way to Fucking?--andreasegde (talk) 22:34, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unladen_Swallow is what an unladen swallow is. Geez guys... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.98.160.75 (talk) 16:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Semi-protection
Due to the article's name, it is susceptible to vandalism, and for this reason, I think it should be indefinitely semi-protected. Æetlr Creejl 20:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- The only reason it is here is because of its name. What to do? I don't fucking know.--andreasegde (talk) 22:38, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Village website doesn't Fucking work?
I've tried visiting this village's web site, and Firefox gave me an error that the address request was being redirected in a way that would never complete.
I thought my broadband provider was blocking this site due to false-posiviting on the URL; but I've now tried again, on an open wireless network with a different provider, and got the same message.
Does anyone know what's wrong? 86.146.93.209 (talk) 15:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe the Fucking page is down?
Article name
Shouldn't this be "Fucking (Austria)" instead of "Fucking, Austria"?
Fucking History
Any chance we could change this to "History of Fucking"?
Also this article is short. Do we know anything else about fucking Austria?
- It would be great if we actually had some Fucking residents familiar with the history of the hamlet contribute. Has anyone tried the Fucking German wiki? Koalorka (talk) 19:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Demonym
Surely the inhabitants of the town aren't "Fuckingers", but "Fuckers"? ;-) Bradley0110 (talk) 20:26, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Is this a real question? Felozzie (talk) 19:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- Is it true that if you don't use it, you lose it? 76.66.97.2 (talk) 13:24, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- Is this a real question? Felozzie (talk) 19:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Have you tried Wikipedia's Reference Desk? They specialize in knowledge questions and will try to answer just about any question in the universe (except how to use Wikipedia, since that is what this Help Desk is for). Just follow the link, select the relevant section, and ask away. I hope this helps. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 05:36, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
ambigdisuation
Is it not traditional and proper, when an article has a name similar to other articles, to place a note at the top of the page such as:
- For other uses, see Fuck (disambiguation).
—Aladdin Sane (talk) 06:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- There are only two likely scenarios in which a reader will come upon this page; 1.) they specifically search for Fucking, Austria or 2.) they come here via Fuck (disambiguation). There's just really no point in utilizing such a hatnote on this article, as there is next to no chance that someone would happen upon this page while looking for another. faithless (speak) 08:50, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- The third possibility is via seeing this name at the WikiMiniAtlas map (and checking if it is perhaps not some sort of vandalism). --Eleassar my talk 08:00, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Maybe we should...
Maybe we should make this article semi-protected. It seems to be a constant target for vandals. And I'm sure we all know how annoying it is to clean up after a vandal hit an article. Just a thought.. Flightx52 (talk) 21:30, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Had this page on my watchlist for a while and feel the vandalism isn't too bad. Plenty of people seem to be watching it so any vandalism is quickly dealt with. Pending changes may be more appropriate. Rehevkor ✉ 21:08, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
See also section
The 15 links in the see also are a bit tenuous, and have no direct link other than being conceived to be offensive. Most aren't offensive at all in many eyes; Hell, Climax, Intercourse and Dildo for example. Seems to be little more than a directory for please with "amusing" names. Do we really need this? Rehevkor ✉ 15:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- You are jumping to conclusions, and expressing a POV when you state have no direct link other than being conceived to be offensive. Most aren't offensive at all in many eyes. Feel free to provide some hard evidence, as to other editor's intent, etc. These links can also be perceived as a fun way to encourage exploration of the encyclopedia. No harm is being done here to Wikipedia. IMO, leave them alone. Lentower (talk) 19:17, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
- Users are free to express opinions on talk pages, it is a key part of building consensus, you using words like "fun" are your own pov for example. However, it's a point of view that they are offensive to begin with, and since they're not in the article and not the talk page, I feel there should be discussed. I'm not sure what you expect me to provide evidence off, but I notice you added most of the entries to that section, on what basis did you do so? The burden of "evidence" would be in your hands in this case. Cheers. Rehevkor ✉ 21:33, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
- See Also sections regularly point to similar articles. Which is the case here. Lentower (talk) 15:10, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- You failed to address any of the issues I raised. My main being: on what basis did you do include the entries? Rehevkor ✉ 01:51, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- That they were related. Lentower (talk) 00:47, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- On what basis? Please stop dodging the question.. Rehevkor ✉ 01:05, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- How are they related? :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 05:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Fing
Why does "fing" redirect here? I was wondering what it meant to "fing" since I've never actually seen fingers fing before. I was hoping for some history of the word "fing" and instead got a city in Austria. -- kainaw™ 19:01, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Fing: short form of fucking apparently. Should really redirect to Fuck (disambiguation) if that is the case, not here. Rehevkor ✉ 19:07, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Stolen sign
Not content with stealing the actual sign, somebody seems to have stolen the JPEG of it that used to be in the article's infobox. Hahaha. Can we have it back, please? Dricherby (talk) 14:34, 2 January 2011 (UTC) LOL it is stolen because people that speak english use it to call people f**king. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1000Fast (talk • contribs) 19:21, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Article Name
Should this article be moved to "Fucking_Austria" (without the comma)? I don't know which is more accurate in Austrian location conventions. For example in the USA we use "Town, State" too. 50.80.139.102 (talk) 03:15, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Great article
Hahaha, just stopping by to say that this article and the talk page are fucking hilarious, well done to everyone who wrote it ;) some of the quotes are too funny haha --andy4789 ★ · (talk? contribs?) 11:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Last Sentence
i dunno why there's no edit option appearing for this article (for me), but someone please delete or severely revise the very last sentence: "But, this is not the first time the 'Fucking villagers' to clamor for changing their village name." Not only is it gratuitous and unencyclopaedic, but it doesn't even have a fucking verb.
This is an archive of past discussions about Fugging, Upper Austria. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Really necessary?
There are children who use wikipedia for school projects!!! My daughter came across this and I am not happy. Making up places just because you think it's funny to give them fictional names like "fucking" is very immature. I'm hoping Wikipedia will see sense and take the article down. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.219.105.240 (talk • contribs) 22:38, 2 May 2012
- (a) Wikipedia is not censored. (b) It's a real town, to the delight of English-speaking children. --jpgordon::==( o ) 23:47, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- (a)Exactly, it's a real town — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.32.189.49 (talk) 15:33, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
- (c) Um, why is your child using Wikipedia for her school projects? --Antodav2007 (talk) 05:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
- How would your daughter "come across" this without it being intentional? I highly doubt your daughter would be clicking on the Random Article page. I'm also sure that if she can type and read, she is already aware of the word "Fucking". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.41.68.6 (talk • contribs) 08:10, 11 July 2012
- I find it extraordinarily funny that this woman actually thought the place was fictional. LOL. But this is probably the funniest article in all of Wikipedia. --Antodav2007 (talk) 05:58, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
- What about if it was the opposite? What about if it was an article (in the Wikipedia of any language) of an English word which may be an offensive word in another language? I haven't come across with any example, yet, but do you that the word “Cona” may be offensive in Portuguese? 85.242.30.202 (talk) 09:43, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
- The best part comes when you read this bit of vandalism from the original poster's computer that appeared a couple weeks before the above complaint, and you realize:
- What about if it was the opposite? What about if it was an article (in the Wikipedia of any language) of an English word which may be an offensive word in another language? I haven't come across with any example, yet, but do you that the word “Cona” may be offensive in Portuguese? 85.242.30.202 (talk) 09:43, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
- I find it extraordinarily funny that this woman actually thought the place was fictional. LOL. But this is probably the funniest article in all of Wikipedia. --Antodav2007 (talk) 05:58, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
- a) exactly what their daughter had been doing on Wikipedia when she "came across" the terribly rude article of Fucking on her parents' computer, or else...
- b) that the original poster was a vandal, and that the outraged complaint above regarding Wikipedia's lack of maturity is just the creation of a fucking troll! (As the Austrians might say.) AtticusX (talk) 13:05, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Surely the Austrians wouldn't want to claim the troll as their own. —Tamfang (talk) 09:06, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- Not the Austrians, I'm sure, but maybe the Norwegians or Icelanders are missing one of their trolls...
- As an Austrian, I am surprised that someone does not accept a whole village in my country - due to it's misunderstood name. Maybe you should read more and talk with your daughter much more... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.22.182.193 (talk) 19:18, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
- Guys, this is a (supposed to be) serious talk about one's thought that the town of Fucking is a fake. Don't take it too far.
- Not the Austrians, I'm sure, but maybe the Norwegians or Icelanders are missing one of their trolls...
- Surely the Austrians wouldn't want to claim the troll as their own. —Tamfang (talk) 09:06, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
(But then again, I could take the comma of the article) Kevon kevono (talk) 22:48, 3 May 2016 (UTC) (What the hell is UTC?) 15:48
What a Fucking joke PyroFloe (talk) 17:49, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Something tells me that the daughter is pretending to be her mother. AussieCoinCollector (talk) 22:47, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Given that original comment was 8 years ago, I think they have learned by now what Fucking is now. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 09:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Well, Wikipedia isn't censored, so there are some articles that you won't expect to find explicit language like Parramatta Road but that's from a quote so it doesn't count. AussieCoinCollector (talk) 21:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- You mean something like Leck mich im Arsch I guess?2001:16B8:5C22:7300:859F:64AE:DB0:E18B (talk) 20:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Well, Wikipedia isn't censored, so there are some articles that you won't expect to find explicit language like Parramatta Road but that's from a quote so it doesn't count. AussieCoinCollector (talk) 21:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Given that original comment was 8 years ago, I think they have learned by now what Fucking is now. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 09:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)