Talk:Game 6 of the 1998 NBA Finals
A fact from Game 6 of the 1998 NBA Finals appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 April 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
last shot
editThe material on the last shot is in the controversy section. The recent edit now duplicates that material, almost word for word. There is absolutely no reason to include the same exact information in two separate sections. nableezy - 18:47, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- On every other page that mentions this issue, the push-off controversy is at least mentioned the first time the shot is described. This was discussed and settled 3 years ago on the Michael Jordan main page [1]. You don't get to move that discussion down to a controversies section just because you created this page. Niremetal (talk) 20:13, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- I dont get to do anything, but neither do you. The Michael Jordan discussion shows that there was consensus to include the material, and it was included here. And, per WP:BRD, if you are reverted you should not just continually re-revert. nableezy - 20:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm restoring the language that is used in every other description of this event. Don't play coy by pretending that not mentioning the push-off until a lower "Controversies" section is not an attempt to marginalize that view. Every other page mentions the push-off the first time - Jordan's bio, the 1998 Finals page, and the page specifically discussing the shot. So pages that are both more general and more specific about the shot in question discuss it the same way. Only the page that you created and that you apparently view as your little fiefdom does it differently. Don't tag me for an edit war that you started by altering the language that every other page uses. Niremetal (talk) 20:35, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- It is not an attempt to marginalize the view, and I am not being coy. I put it in the controversies section along with the "controversies" about the shot before halftime not counting and Harper's later counting. And I did not "start" the edit war, a quick look at the history of the page shows that. But fine, I will move the rest of the controversies section into the game section. nableezy - 21:08, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm restoring the language that is used in every other description of this event. Don't play coy by pretending that not mentioning the push-off until a lower "Controversies" section is not an attempt to marginalize that view. Every other page mentions the push-off the first time - Jordan's bio, the 1998 Finals page, and the page specifically discussing the shot. So pages that are both more general and more specific about the shot in question discuss it the same way. Only the page that you created and that you apparently view as your little fiefdom does it differently. Don't tag me for an edit war that you started by altering the language that every other page uses. Niremetal (talk) 20:35, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- I dont get to do anything, but neither do you. The Michael Jordan discussion shows that there was consensus to include the material, and it was included here. And, per WP:BRD, if you are reverted you should not just continually re-revert. nableezy - 20:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Game 6 of the 1998 NBA Finals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nba.com/finals98/00738814.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080315041350/http://www.nypost.com/seven/08172007/sports/former_nba_ref_blasts_officiating_sports_fred_kerber.htm to http://www.nypost.com/seven/08172007/sports/former_nba_ref_blasts_officiating_sports_fred_kerber.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:18, 10 October 2017 (UTC)