This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
"Its first film OMG – Oh My God!, was banned in UAE and Malaysia" - I would write out United Arab Emirates fully here
"In India a few screenings of the film had to be cancelled and a police case was lodged against the filmmakers and actors for hurting religious sentiments" - might read better as A few screenings of the film had to be cancelled in India and a police case lodged against the filmmakers and actors for harming religious sentiments
The lead meets WP:LEAD and the GA criteria, though I would mention a little more on the production house's history in order to fully summarise
"The film received poor initial collection at the box office[15] but because of word of mouth it picked up and proved to be a commercial success" - this claim of success due to word of mouth is unreferenced, though I stand wrong if it's in one of the other citations. Also it might be better to replace "because" with "due to"
I couldn't find anything major enough to constitute putting this on hold - so I'll promote this now. It is overall well written, well referenced and the article is broad, thus meeting the GA criteria. Well done! JAGUAR11:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Reply