 | HMS Tribune (1918) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 2, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Tribune (1918)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 10:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
I will get to this one shortly. Zawed (talk) 10:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Apologies for the delay in coming back to this, comments as follows:
Design and development
- one of thirty-three Admiralty S class destroyers...: is the Admiralty supposed to be there? In the lead only S class is used.
- Removed.
- The converted p.p length doesn't quite match what is in the infobox, ditto the speed figures
- Made consistent.
- Should shp be linked/converted in the infobox?
- Linked and converted.
- The sentence that starts The ship was designed to mount two 18-inch... is quite long with a lot of commas. It could be broken up.
- Split in two.
Construction and career
- On 21 September 1923, Tribune was recommissioned...: there is no mention of being decommissioned?
- Amended.
Other stuff
- Image tags OK
- dupe links: long tons
That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 09:40, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Zawed: Thank you for this review. I believe I have completed the changes. simongraham (talk) 02:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, the changes look fine. I am going to pass this as GA as I believe that it meets the necessary criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)