Talk:Heterocrossa ignobilis

Latest comment: 6 years ago by No such user in topic Requested move 15 June 2018

Current name for species

edit

It appears from the New Zealand Organisms Register that the current accepted name for this species is Heterocrossa ignobilis (Philpott, 1930). I refer any other editors to Volume 9 of the Insects of Hawai where Zimmerman, on page 797 argues that the Heterocrassa genus should not a synonym of Carposina as the genitalia in this genus are distinctive. This was accepted by Dugdale in Lepidoptera - annotated catalogue, and keys to family-group taxa as well as in the 2012 publication New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity. Unless other editors have an objection I propose editing this article to reflect this.Ambrosia10 (talk) 02:45, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 15 June 2018

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved along with

In the future, please consider bundling similar requests per procedure at WP:RM#CM; I understand that it took several days to research, but moving one by one could have resulted in inconsistency. Non-experts were unlikely to object, anyway. Thanks. No such user (talk) 12:11, 18 June 2018 (UTC)Reply



Carposina ignobilisHeterocrossa ignobilis – The New Zealand Organisms Register states that the current accepted name for this species is Heterocrossa ignobilis (Philpott, 1930). I refer any other editors to Volume 9 of the Insects of Hawai where Zimmerman, on page 797 argues that the Heterocrassa genus should not a synonym of Carposina as the genitalia in this genus are distinctive. This was accepted by Dugdale in Lepidoptera - annotated catalogue, and keys to family-group taxa as well as in the 2012 publication New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity. Please see the section on taxonomy in the edited article. Ambrosia10 (talk) 01:45, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.