Talk:I, a Woman

Latest comment: 10 years ago by MichaelQSchmidt in topic From the article author

From the article author

edit
The article is crap. but I'm not really up to speed on the complexities of setting up a Wikipedia article, and I'm not going to take the time to learn. The film exists. Do what fix-up it needs. I don't normally read movie reviews, so I've no idea what is actually needed or normal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A Karley (talkcontribs) 13:36, 22 October 2014‎
@A Karley: It's done. Really was not too difficult. I apologize for someone else not seeing the article's potential. Check my edits to see how and what was needed, and take a look at MOS:FILM for future film articles. Thank you for your contribution, and be well. Schmidt, Michael Q. 09:24, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Huge improvement

edit

Thanks to Schmidt above for his huge improvements. He's obviously someone who knows his way around Wikipedia (I just know my way around information ; when all the alternative systems have been dead for a decade, then the remaining single system may be considered worth learning. Whatever system that is.)

None of the information Schmidt presents conflicts with the little information I had on the film.

I suspect that the "consider for deletion" flag can now be lifted. Aidan Karley (talk) 10:38, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

@A Karley:   Not my first rodeo and you are very welcome. See WP:CLOSEAFD. They run their course, and the tag will be removed upon closure. But even if "involved", the nominator can even close it himself under Speedy Keep #1 if no one else feels a delete merited and he sees his concerns have been met. The only "conflict" with your original contribution was the film's release year. Be well, Schmidt, Michael Q. 11:33, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply