Talk:I, a Woman
(Redirected from Talk:I a Woman)
Latest comment: 10 years ago by MichaelQSchmidt in topic From the article author
This article was nominated for deletion on 22 October 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
A fact from I, a Woman appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 December 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From the article author
edit- The article is crap. but I'm not really up to speed on the complexities of setting up a Wikipedia article, and I'm not going to take the time to learn. The film exists. Do what fix-up it needs. I don't normally read movie reviews, so I've no idea what is actually needed or normal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A Karley (talk • contribs) 13:36, 22 October 2014
- @A Karley: It's done. Really was not too difficult. I apologize for someone else not seeing the article's potential. Check my edits to see how and what was needed, and take a look at MOS:FILM for future film articles. Thank you for your contribution, and be well. Schmidt, Michael Q. 09:24, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Huge improvement
editThanks to Schmidt above for his huge improvements. He's obviously someone who knows his way around Wikipedia (I just know my way around information ; when all the alternative systems have been dead for a decade, then the remaining single system may be considered worth learning. Whatever system that is.)
None of the information Schmidt presents conflicts with the little information I had on the film.
I suspect that the "consider for deletion" flag can now be lifted. Aidan Karley (talk) 10:38, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
- @A Karley: Not my first rodeo and you are very welcome. See WP:CLOSEAFD. They run their course, and the tag will be removed upon closure. But even if "involved", the nominator can even close it himself under Speedy Keep #1 if no one else feels a delete merited and he sees his concerns have been met. The only "conflict" with your original contribution was the film's release year. Be well, Schmidt, Michael Q. 11:33, 23 October 2014 (UTC)