Talk:Ja'fari school

Latest comment: 30 days ago by DivineReality in topic Deleted History Portion

Much work needed

edit

This article has absolutely nothing about, for instance, the history of Ja'fari jurisprudence. When did it come into being as a separate madhhab? When was it named? Languagehat (talk) 23:17, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

New section on Juridicial laws

edit

@Sa.vakilian:I Want to add a section on juridicial laws or Qavaed Feqhi.m,sharaf (talk)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ja'fari jurisprudence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:59, 18 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move to Jaʽfari?

edit

See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Islam#Inconsistency_in_the_naming_of_madhhab_articles for rationale and post your comments there. TigraanClick here to contact me 16:59, 4 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Deleted History Portion

edit

My history portion was deleted for being "poorly sourced." This is utterly false, I even cited the Encyclopedia Iranica. It's already accepted on the Nader Shah page thus my edits are not even new to Wikipedia and have been accepted long ago. My edits are solid. I'll add another: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gopsbad/issue/59715/815609 DivineReality (talk) 11:49, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

No response. I use both Sunni and Shi'a sources. All of my sources are sound. I even used the Encyclopædia Iranica as a source, I must reiterate--how could someone find that contentious? It's written by Iranians about their own history. Please read my actual sources before just jumping to revert edits. Thanks. DivineReality (talk) 13:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply