Fixes

edit

Very sorry to respond in english! I edited for concision and clarity. I moved several things to make the article easier to read. I did not change any content or meaning. I had never heard of her but was interested in this entry! Thanks for adding this. Resonanteye 00:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Album genre confusion

edit

All the album links have "Pop" as genre description, but in the article it is pop/folk or folk/pop (if anyone insists). Well, to cut a long story short, those should be aligned. -andy 85.179.48.143 (talk) 18:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I fixed it. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

where does it say that she has sold over 2 milion albums? As far as I know in Serbia there is no company like IFPI which public's the official album sales...sooo?!?!?!?! "and their wedding ceremony was fabulous" what the...?! I thought that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.24.20.2 (talk) 10:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC) She has sold even more than that. It's a fact. Her whole DIVA Album (2012) has been sold out since the day it has been released. I can't find a place where they have it available anywhere! And for the IFPI thing, we don't have that, but we do have City Records, her publisher. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.245.0.72 (talk) 10:02, 25 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Unsupported claims

edit

"She's probably the biggest female pop icon in Europe." "She's famous in Germany,France,Greece,Great Britain and Italy." "She has widely became known by her appearance of a vulgar person, but much of that is just a marketing trick, made by her P.R." Please verify. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.200.65.74 (talk) 10:57, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Genre

edit

All of the sources in the article and others that I can find describe Karleuša as a turbo-folk singer, but someone keeps changing the article to the generic "pop" rather than the more precise genre. Whoever you are, could you please explain why you feel that we shouldn't follow what is written in reliable sources? Phil Bridger (talk) 21:08, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I didn't change that, but maybe people change it because her last four albums were pure pop, and her last six albums are not folk genre, which can be verified on all of the wikipages of her albums. Fichomir (talk) 17:56, 4 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Her nickname is often a subject of controversy, due to homonymity with Serbo-Croatian slur against dumb witted popular persons, but there is no reason for it not to be mentioned. 178.223.69.143 (talk) 03:28, 26 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

It can be mentioned only if reliably sourced. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:34, 26 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jelena Karleuša. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:01, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 10:21, 9 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:08, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply