Talk:Johnny Hatley

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 21:42, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Johnny Hatley quit professional football to become a full-time rodeo competitor? Source: Rodeo Hall of Fame website ("Rodeo had remained Hatley’s favorite sport since college and in 1956 he quit football to follow the circuit full time.")
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Muzamil Sherzad

Moved to mainspace by BeanieFan11 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC).

• What a neat little oddity. Easily hits length requirement and is new enough. No concerns about inline sourcing and all sources appear reliable, editorial statements are quoted & cited so no POV concerns, Earwig has no hits. I found the hook interesting, as someone who doesn't care about sports - why quit the rock star level sport of football to go into rodeo? I have no issues to point out, so we're good to go here. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:41, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Johnny Hatley/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 14:21, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

I'll review this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:21, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments

• I copyedited the article here
• I honestly have no other comments, nice work.
• Source spot check: 2, 4, 5, 10, 13, 19, 25, 29, 36, 39
  • Ref #36 you have on two consecutive sentences. You can just have it once after the second sentence.

Putting on hold just to make sure you are good with my copyedits. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

• @Gonzo fan2007: Made the one correction you suggested. I'm fine with your copyedits. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:25, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Passing. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.