Talk:Judiciary of India
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Judiciary of India article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Topic not complete
editthe topic is not yet complete..please wait for a few hours.. --ebin viswanath 23:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- I would request you to please properly reference the page. --Bhadani (talk) 06:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- You should also sign your comments on talk pages. It is rather easy. --Bhadani (talk) 06:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Assisting justices
editCould anyone please give the names of the 25 Assisting Justices of the supreme court? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asksudu (talk • contribs) 13:24, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Second footnote not existing
editPlease remove or substitute. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.173.213.181 (talk) 11:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Judiciary of India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://doj.gov.in/sites/default/files/userfiles/SUGGESTIONS.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110205101852/http://india.gov.in/howdo/otherservice_details.php?service=24 to http://india.gov.in/howdo/otherservice_details.php?service=24
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Judiciary of India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160505192102/http://www.dayafterindia.com/magz_detail_news.php?id=4202 to http://www.dayafterindia.com/magz_detail_news.php?id=4202
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208062912/http://doj.gov.in/?q=node%2F352 to http://doj.gov.in/?q=node%2F352
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130122225727/http://indiancourts.nic.in/districtcourt.html to http://www.indiancourts.nic.in/districtcourt.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120115192437/http://www.transparency.org/publications/annual_report to http://www.transparency.org/publications/annual_report
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150610152423/http://www.timesofoman.com/News/43789/Article-National-Lok-Adalat-disposes-10%2025-million-cases to http://www.timesofoman.com/News/43789/Article-National-Lok-Adalat-disposes-10%2025-million-cases
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151216022906/http://www.freepressjournal.in/lok-adalats-dispose-8-80-lakh-cases/ to http://www.freepressjournal.in/lok-adalats-dispose-8-80-lakh-cases/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111022173912/http://barandbench.com/brief/2/1100/shanti-bhushan-makes-news-again-says-he-would-rather-go-to-jail-than-apologize-for-leveling-corruption-charges-against-judiciary to http://barandbench.com/brief/2/1100/shanti-bhushan-makes-news-again-says-he-would-rather-go-to-jail-than-apologize-for-leveling-corruption-charges-against-judiciary
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:18, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Judiciary of India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208093148/http://www.supremecourtofindia.nic.in/FileServer/2015-11-05_1446719693.pdf to http://www.supremecourtofindia.nic.in/FileServer/2015-11-05_1446719693.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151209000756/http://www.thestatesman.com/news/india/government-seeks-public-suggestions-to-improve-collegium-system/102044.html to http://www.thestatesman.com/news/india/government-seeks-public-suggestions-to-improve-collegium-system/102044.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111019224421/http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/history.htm to http://www.supremecourtofindia.nic.in/history.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160430013654/http://www.financialexpress.com/article/fe-columnist/the-fault-lies-not-in-our-stars-but-in-ourselves/244315/ to http://www.financialexpress.com/article/fe-columnist/the-fault-lies-not-in-our-stars-but-in-ourselves/244315/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151031070901/http://www.supremecourtofindia.nic.in/courtnews.htm to http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/courtnews.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121101224704/http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/scrules1966.pdf to http://www.supremecourtofindia.nic.in/scrules1966.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:
- 1567230400Patna-High-Court-1.jpg
- A H.Court.jpg
- CJI 1.png
- CJI chamber.jpg
- Goddess of Justice.jpg
- JJ06.jpg
- Saket-court 660 010713023910.jpg
- Supreme courtofIndia-630x381.jpg
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:24, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Add 'More Citations Needed' add 'Unreferenced' to the whole or parts of this article
editThere is a lot of, what seems to be, anecdotal information in this article. Considering this is an important article, either citations need to be added or this article needed to be cleaned up. Abhijeetviswa (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:56, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Relevant example of judiciary
editHelp me 2405:204:A5A8:15A2:A371:AC05:18C1:30D0 (talk) 04:02, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Daughters rights
editHello! I am an Indian citizen. I have one query. Why does Christian daughters does stand in 2005 ammendment hindu law? Are we Christian staying in India now hindu? 103.179.195.38 (talk) 09:33, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Shridevi ganachari
editI worked for past before. 202.148.63.159 (talk) 13:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Ordering of sections
editThe section #3 'Career Progression' should be below #4 'Judicial Hierarchy', since the latter is the core of this article. I don't if I am allowed to directly tod that or if needs a moderator approval. Please advise.
I don't know if moderators get a notification for this, or if they are highly swamped. So I will probably wait for a few weeks, and if by then I haven't got a response either way, I can go ahead and switch the order for #3 and #4. asitmonty (talk) 11:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)