Talk:Kailash Vijayvargiya

Do not discuss apart WP:TPG

Please avoid to put information on talk pages or anywhere on Wikipedia, that is unacceptable and falls under

• Wikipedia:No personal attacks

• WP:NOTPROMOTION

• WP:PRIVACY

for more awareness about how to behave at talk pages, please go for WP:TPG --Dr.pragmatist (talk) 07:17, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Do Not Delete Referenced Material

@Victoryk - Please do not delete the referenced material from the page. If you come across any information that your feel might be wrong, discuss it on the Talk page. Katyaan (talk) 13:16, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Invalid information on bio

He is member of legislative assembly of state of MP, not US House of Representatives. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.140.133.214 (talk) 13:50, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Agree. That office must be removed Pranjalvsv (talk) 18:30, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Content Looks Like Advertisement

The content under Political Career looks like advertisement and is not referenced. It should be removed.Learner (talk) 05:05, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Exactly.

ABCDSocrates (talk) 06:25, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Copyright violation

Anyone wondering why did I nuke bulk of the contents of the article, is just because it was nothing but a copyright infringement of multiple sources. A report of the violation may be seen here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask here. Regards, -Anupmehra -Let's talk! 14:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

References duplicate section

I have removed the duplicate section References from the main article which included following uncited references.

• http://www.dailypioneer.com/state-editions/bhopal/kishanganj-overbridge-still-a-far-cry-people-inconvenienced.html
• http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/indore/Global-Investors-Summit-to-be-held-in-a-wi-fi-zone/articleshow/16447032.cms
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NzmMNA33pw
• http://indianexpress.com/article/news-archive/web/indore-land-deal-minister-gets-lokayukta-clean-chit

Knowledgeable editors about the subject is requested to use these references wisely in the article. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 09:01, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Reverted Edits

@CutestPenguin: - Hello Cutest Penguin. You just reverted my edits which I put up because the page has many issues. The page still has all those problems and in a single read it is clear that it is a promotional content. Further, if you look into the history of the page, you can very well see the case. Looking for co-operation. Katyaan (talk) 09:23, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

@Katyaan: The subject have significant coverage in independent sources which require rewriting and citing the contents. Instead of tagging multiple-issue template you can help the article in improving and that will be appreciated too. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 09:35, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

@CutestPenguin: - Yes it has but the problem is if you remove the promotional content, the person who seems to act on behalf on the subject, restores it! If you carefully go through the references, you will find that they have been wrongly cited. The user has used the references in wrong context and as a part of self-inference.Katyaan (talk) 09:38, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Externally! @Katyaan: that's why I mentioned above that the knowledgeable person about the subject use the references wisely. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 09:40, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

@CutestPenguin: - The page was once nuked as well by another senior editor and was re-created. If you go through the history of this page you will come to know of it. This is the reason why it was protected for some time as well. Try updating the page in good faith and removing the wrong content, you will understand what I am trying to convey. It will be restored from different IPs.Katyaan (talk) 09:44, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

@CutestPenguin: & @Katyaan: - Lets discuss about - What all are the unsourced material. & How can neutrality be achieved for the article?

Year mistake?

In the "In state administration" section, the first sentence has the year 2008, while the ones after it have 2004. I'm not sure if there is a mistake or not, or what the right piece of information to put there is if it is wrong. CoolieCoolster (talk) 07:16, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Credentials

Exactly how "academically qualified" is this man? ABCDSocrates (talk) 06:24, 13 June 2019 (UTC)