Talk:Kalavati Devi
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Unibrow69420 in topic Interesting article
A fact from Kalavati Devi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 May 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 09:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Kalavati Devi (pictured) built 4,000 toilets so people in Kanpur didn't have to live in a "living hell"?responsible for building more than 4,000 toilets in villages in and around Kanpur.... living hell
- ALT1:... that women would "sacrifice their dignity every single day" until Kalavati Devi (pictured) built 4,000 toilets?sacrifice their dignity every single day
- Comment: Titodutta's idea to nom this - thanks Tittodutta
Created/expanded by Victuallers (talk) and Titodutta (talk). Nominated by Victuallers (talk) at 12:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC).
- Reviewing... DTM (talk) 05:43, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Article created on 5 April 2020 and nominated within time. It is long enough and Earwigs checks out - "Violation Unlikely". The hook image is used in the article, is clear enough, and is licensed adequately. No issues with the first hook.
- Just two clarifications needed. One - Is 'The Logical Indian' (thelogicalindian.com) a reliable enough source here? Two - I am a bit unsure about whether a QPQ is needed here or not...? DTM (talk) 06:14, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. Clarifications. Not sure about the QPQ either but I anticipated that it may be required so I reviewed this for QPQ.... As for TheLogicalIndian.com. I had that worry too but I read here. This site is not aspiring to clickbait (as many former newspapers are doing). I could find a different source but I don't think I could find a more reliable one. Victuallers (talk) 11:07, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. Everything seems alright to me. GTG DTM (talk) 09:14, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. Clarifications. Not sure about the QPQ either but I anticipated that it may be required so I reviewed this for QPQ.... As for TheLogicalIndian.com. I had that worry too but I read here. This site is not aspiring to clickbait (as many former newspapers are doing). I could find a different source but I don't think I could find a more reliable one. Victuallers (talk) 11:07, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Interesting article
editFound this today in the DYK section. Would love to see this article expanded.Unibrow69420 (talk) 08:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)