Talk:Kent Gaydos

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kent Gaydos/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 01:27, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

I'll review this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 01:27, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments

• I copyedited the article here. Let me know if you disagree with any of the edits.
• I archived the reference links.
• Remove the "See also" section. Not helpful in any way.
• A link to wide receiver is duplicated in the body of the article.
• Ref spot checks: #2, 5, 9, 16, 19, 21

Looks good, putting on hold. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:02, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

• @Gonzo fan2007: Fixed both issues. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:05, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Nie work, passing. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 20:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Kent Gaydos played quarterback in high school, then wide receiver in college, and in the NFL changed to tight end before going back to receiver, to tight end again and then receiver another time? Source: Orlando Sentinel (qb in HS, then receiver in college) - tight end in the NFL in 1972 - switched to receiver in '73 - tight end again in '74 - receiver again in '75
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Monastery death
  • Comment: I might be a little late to nominate the expansion - if so, I request a one-day extension per Wikipedia:Did you know/Guidelines#Newness

5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Self-nominated at 21:05, 15 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Kent Gaydos; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• @BeanieFan11: A reminder that a QPQ needs to be completed for this nomination. Z1720 (talk) 14:24, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Done. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:42, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @BeanieFan11: Good article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:12, 25 September 2023 (UTC)