Talk:Lavale Thomas

Lavale Thomas has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 18, 2023. (Reviewed version).

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

National Football League Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Green Bay Packers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Bay Packers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Green Bay Packers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Green Bay PackersWikipedia:WikiProject Green Bay PackersTemplate:WikiProject Green Bay PackersGreen Bay Packers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

College football Low‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 1 year ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Passed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:02, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lavale Thomas/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 15:47, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:47, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments

In the infobox, you have him going from 1987 to 1989 for the Packers, but he never played in 89 and the sources only having him going til 1988.
- Here's my thoughts: when someone signs with a team in, say, 1989 and is released in training camp, their infobox entry states "[Team] (1989)" - and Thomas was on the team in 1987, 1988 and was released in training camp in 1989 - so I don't see why it should say (1987–1988) instead of (1987–1989) when if he had only been on the team for the brief time he was in 1989 it would have said (1989).
  - I guess I am looking at the source, which I assume is PFR. PFR doesn't have him on the team in 1989. That said, its a fairly minor point, so I will leave it up to you. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:02, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
NFL needs to be spelled out during the first use in the lead.
- Done.
You need to add a comma after 1963 in the Early life section.
- Done.
That season, he played 11 games and was one of the team's top backs, running for 264 yards and averaging 4.6 yards-per-carry with three rushing touchdowns although being limited due to injury., run-on sentence, maybe split up into 2.
- Done.
NFLPA should be spelled out during its first use.
- Done.
Ref spot check: #4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 20, 23

Looks good, putting on hold. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:29, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Gonzo fan2007: Responded to your points. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Looks good, passing. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:02, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic