![]() | Leo Katalinas has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 25, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Leo Katalinas be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Leo Katalinas/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 22:28, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
I'll review this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:28, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Comments
edit- I found it easier to just copyedit it myself. If you disagree with any of the edits, just let me know.
nickname "Thor," the German god of thunder,
, I'm thinking parenthesis would be better here- There are some references that don't have access-dates (the non-newspaper ones)
- Spot check:
- Ref 2, 4, 8, 9, 12, 17, 22, 25 all look good.
- Ref 8: spelling error in sophomores
Nice work, putting on hold. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 02:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Gonzo fan2007: Thanks for the review and copyedits - I was in somewhat of a rush writing this so my grammar may not have been the best. I've fixed the other issues but I noticed you made a mistake in one of your copyedits: you changed the sentence
He was the second-youngest of four brothers who played football; both his brothers Ed and Joe each played at Georgetown, the latter also played professionally, and John through at least high school
toHe was the second-youngest of four brothers who played football; both of his brothers—Ed and Joe—each played at Georgetown. The latter also played professionally and the former through at least high school
but that makes the sentence incorrect; I may have been a bit sloppy in writing that part, but what I meant to communicate in that sentence was that Leo was the second-youngest of four brothers, with Ed and Joe both playing at Georgetown, Joe also playing professionally, and John, the youngest, playing through at least high school. Can you think of a good way to word it? Thanks. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2023 (UTC)- Maybe just elaborate it a bit?
two of his brothers—Ed and Joe—each played at Georgetown, with Joe continuing on to play professionally. The youngest, John, played football at least through high school.
« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:46, 25 August 2023 (UTC)- @Gonzo fan2007: I like it. I changed the wording to your suggestion. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe just elaborate it a bit?
- Looks good, passing. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.