Talk:Lewisham station

Two separate stations

I would strongly disagree that the DLR and Railway station should be included in one article. They are two separate structures built at different times in two seperate places. You can't interchange from platform to platform like you can at Stratford or Bank which should be under one article. Therefore I think this article should be Lewisham Railway Station and there should be a new page for Lewisham DLR Station. (82.27.205.238 (talk) 14:13, 30 July 2010 (UTC))

rail lines box

I've reverted all the additions. It looked a joke, and some of them don't even stop here. Nunhead was listed twice as a destination and it probably gets the least trains from here. MRSC 13:49, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Description

Although my reference book [Railways of the Southern Region, Geoffrey Body, PSL Field Guides 1989 edition] includes a plan of the junctions, I cannot include it here, and unfortunately the map referred to in the article is insufficiently clear to illustrate all the various parts of the layout. It is unfortunate that we have to use it - the one at www.streetmap.co.uk is much clearer. Peter Shearan 18:37, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

although the aerial photo does make it clearer! Peter Shearan 18:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

photos

i feel that some photos of the mainline station platforms would be a good addition. there are lots of the DLR area. If anybody has any and that they dont mine being on here it would be nice lordmwa (talk) 20:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://kentrail.org.uk/lewisham.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Redrose64 (talk) 17:47, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on Lewisham station

Cyberbot II has detected links on Lewisham station which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• https://www.change.org/p/southeastern-railway-open-the-platform-4-gate-at-lewisham-railway-station-all-day-every-day-and-add-standalone-oyster-readers-to-it

  Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

 Done --Redrose64 (talk) 21:11, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lewisham station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304075330/http://www.busman.qmul.ac.uk/research/researchcentres/Thecentreformanagementandorganisationalhistory/148170.pdf to http://www.busman.qmul.ac.uk/research/researchcentres/Thecentreformanagementandorganisationalhistory/148170.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lewisham station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090529093731/http://www.southeasternrailway.co.uk/index.php/routes_stations/stations/view to http://www.southeasternrailway.co.uk/index.php/routes_stations/stations/view
• Added archive https://archive.is/20070709171647/http://www.southeasternrailway.co.uk/stations.php?crs=LEW to http://www.southeasternrailway.co.uk/stations.php?crs=LEW
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081221232740/http://www.btp.police.uk/about_us/areas/london_south.aspx to http://www.btp.police.uk/about_us/areas/london_south.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Station Layout —tone not encyclopedic

I've marked paragraphs 2 and 3 of the *Station Layout* section with the POV_statement inline template, as there appears to be bias in the tone used to describe the station architecture. Saxbophone (talk) 15:23, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Two stations listed as one.

These are separate stations. Passengers have to exit one (through the barriers) before entering the other. They're managed by separate companies. They share no services, therefore share no platforms, which makes the sequential numbering of platforms tenuous. Are there any genuine reasons to list these as combined which I'm missing? --Dave F63 (talk) 20:31, 15 October 2020 (UTC)