Talk:Lili Reinhart

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2019 and 10 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Emaleefx.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

question

born in 1996 shes 22..no way she looks a bit older why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.73.101.6 (talk) 14:14, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

OCD

Just wanted to add she was diagnosed with OCD as a child and I wasn't sure why my addition regarding this matter was removed. Sparrowman980 (talk) 21:11, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

RfC about Cole Sprouse relationship

Should Reinhart's relationship with actor Cole Sprouse be included in their respective personal life sections? KyleJoan^talk 04:26, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

• Include as proposer. Their relationship is documented extensively in reliable sources, including the Cut, Entertainment Weekly, The Independent, People, USA Today, Vanity Fair, Vogue, and Vulture. A single sentence seems appropriate. KyleJoan^talk 05:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
• Totally illegitimate RFC: we don't include people's dating histories no matter how extensively they're documented. Just because something can be sourced doesn't mean it should be included. See WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTGOSSIP. Suggest you withdraw, especially since an RfC should be the last resort, not the first. —Joeyconnick (talk) 05:59, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Eight reliable sources (amongst a plethora of others) in the span of three years are more than sufficient to support inclusion based on the relationship's enduring notability per WP:NOTNEWS. WP:GOSSIP, on the other hand, does not bear any relevance since including the relationship would not be libellous or infringe the subjects' right to privacy per the aforementioned sources. All of that said, if you don't believe an RfC is necessary, then how would you suggest we settle this content dispute, Joeyconnick? KyleJoan^talk 06:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
    • I suggest we settle it by you accepting the well-established consensus that we don't list people's dating histories. Again, doesn't matter how many times it is sourced or mentioned or whatever, in however many reputable sources. We're not the entertainment press, we're not WP:INDISCRIMINATE. It's not content we include. —Joeyconnick (talk) 06:28, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
      • Can you direct me to this well-established consensus? KyleJoan^talk 06:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
• Support. We include this information, if reliably sourced, all the time on BLPs and biographies. A subject’s romantic history remains both a point of interest for our readers, and a means of better understanding of the subject’s life. Gleeanon409 (talk) 15:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
• Oppose. Apart from the long-standing convention mentioned of not covering mere 'dating', most of these sources aren't actually talking about a relationship - they are talking about a rumoured break-up, and one at least is talking about how separate they keep their personal and public lives. This sort of speculation is precisely why WP shouldn't go down this particular rabbit-hole, which leads to an are they/aren't they world of trivial gossip column fodder. Frankly, who cares? Pincrete (talk) 08:06, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
  • We are not discussing mere 'dating', as Reinhart was quoted in the Vanity Fair article as saying that she and Sprouse were acknowledging that [they were] in a relationship, with The Independent writing that the two had been in a two-year relationship in 2019. Furthermore, the question is whether to include the relationship itself, not the breakup rumors. No one is suggesting that the personal life sections read, "Sprouse and Reinhart entered a relationship in 2017. There were rumors that the two had broken up in 2018, 2019, and 2020." KyleJoan^talk 08:35, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Support While we aren't the entertainment press, this is a BLP about an entertainer, so I'm taking that into considerations. The relationship is well sourced and the information added takes a WP:NPOV. Comatmebro (talk) 01:49, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose per Joeyconnick and Pincrete. - Brojam (talk) 02:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 September 2020

for Lili Reinhart personal life she dated her Riverdale costar for 3 years and broken up in March of 2021 WORKit17$ (talk) 17:46, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. General Ization ^Talk 18:01, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Also, see the section just above. General Ization ^Talk 18:02, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Currently?

The article says Riverdale is "currently renewed". This is supposed to be an encyclopedia, words such as "currently" should not be used, please read WP:RELTIME. An encyclopedia should be specific and say when or leave it out entirely if it is not important. This is a basic writing failure that happen far far too often.
Please fix this article by deleting the word "currently" (or other rephrasing). -- 109.76.146.100 (talk) 14:11, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Replace X: "is currently renewed for a fifth season" with Y: "was renewed for a fifth season" -- 109.76.146.100 (talk) 14:14, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

IPA

Can we add the pronunciation of her last name: /ˈraɪnhɒrt/

References

Semi-protected edit request on 30 January 2024

Add that Reinhart was diagnosed with alopecia. 107.122.81.136 (talk) 23:57, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC)