Talk:Lio (singer)

Vanda, not Wanda

Her name is "Vanda" and not "Wanda" as she is born Potuguese and not English! (Just see Wikipedia in Portuguese) — Preceding unsigned comment added by E.Polti (talk • contribs) 09:03, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 07:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lio.jpg

Image:Lio.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Unintentional Witticism

"Since 2008, Lio has been a judge on the French "pop idol" show Nouvelle Star. In 2009, she returned to music" Brilliant! :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.161.186.197 (talk) 10:27, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Lio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131110161809/http://www.zerecords.com/new/album_main.php?id=215 to http://www.zerecords.com/new/album_main.php?id=215
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140223022545/http://www.freaksvillerec.com/start.php?lang=fr&rub=6&nom_categorie=SINGLES&titre_single=laveilledemanaissance&lid_single=57 to http://www.freaksvillerec.com/start.php?lang=fr&rub=6&nom_categorie=SINGLES&titre_single=laveilledemanaissance&lid_single=57
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140223023946/http://www.freaksvillerec.com/start.php?lang=fr&rub=7&lid_news=167 to http://www.freaksvillerec.com/start.php?lang=fr&rub=7&lid_news=167
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100730042230/http://www.zerecords.com/2010/artists_biography.php?id=23 to http://www.zerecords.com/2010/artists_biography.php?id=23

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514030049/http://www.rfimusique.com/siteen/biographie/biographie_6033.asp to http://www.rfimusique.com/siteEn/biographie/biographie_6033.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 25 February 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. – robertsky (talk) 15:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

---

• Lio → Lio (singer)
• Lio (disambiguation) → Lio

– No primary topic. Possibly gets enough pageviews, but makes little to no impression for long-term significance on Google Search, Scholar, Books, News. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 15:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

• Support per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Women in Music has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:50, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Drag Race has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:50, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Women has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Pop music has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose. A clear primary topic, averaging 200 views per day. Nothing else comes close. Station1 (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
• We shouldn't exclude Lio Rush from consideration here because that article uses the term mononymously in reference to them, it's plausible that there is a non-trivial segment of the average English reader population that recognizes ambiguity there because it's an American topic.
  Mass views for all time is somewhat confusing because the base chemical elements are linked, but the Lithium oxide formula actually includes a significant addition of 2, so that's only vaguely ambiguous (we'd have to weigh the idea of how much the average reader actually knows about chemical formulas?).
  The L.I.O. from the French group is referred to mononymously in the linked article, but we don't have an article written about them - I don't know if there is potential for it.
  The topic of Liberal international order also mentions the acronym, and has generally similar traffic. There's also the long tail.
  Since it's not really clear that a larger contingent of average English readers will strongly associate this term with a Belgian singer from the '80s, we should try full disambiguation and actually verify what the readers want to see before we make conclusions on what might be the primary topic by usage. --Joy (talk) 10:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
• Support per nom. No primary topic by long-term significance. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.