Talk:List of constituencies of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly

Disputed

The lead says:

"In Andhra Pradesh, the Vidhan Sabha, or Legislative Assembly, has 175 constituencies. 48 constituencies are reserved for the Scheduled Castes candidates and 19 constituencies are reserved for the Scheduled tribes candidates."

Problems:

• The link given in the references section is broken.
• There's no "as of" date, so we can't compare against the source even if found.
• The table has 137 entries in it, which doesn't seem to have any relation to those numbers.
• The last "S. No." is 292, not 137 or 175 or whatever. Why are there gaps in this apparent sequence number at: 286–289, 275–282, 203–226, 24–142?
  • What is this field for anyway?

—[AlanM1(talk)]— 09:22, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

The link broke fairly recently, sometime between February and June, perhaps due to some districts moving out of Andhra Pradesh to Telangana, (which made gaps: diff) I included archive information, but it should not be taken as current. There is still a current chart to be compared with its old version, archived at about the same time as the article's reference. The reference uses "Sl. No." which is basically the same as the constituency number, but I don't know if this is actually the same as the "S. No." in the article's table header. —PC-XT+ 22:09, 7 July 2014 (UTC) 22:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of constituencies of Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070617234445/http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Metadata/Metada.htm to http://censusindia.gov.in/Metadata/Metada.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop spoiling the table

@Sandeep kumar 83:, why are you insisting on spoiling the table of the article? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:18, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

@MPGuy2824 There's no communication from the user https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/Sandeep%20kumar%2083, I've left a message on their talk page, will see if there will be a response at all — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:29, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

I am not spopiling any table of the aeticle I am just sorting it out by distrcit wise in alpahbetical order. [[User:Kurapati Dileep Chowdary|Kurapati Dileep Chowdary]] ([[User talk:Kurapati Dileep Chowdary|talk]]) (talk) 05:46, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

When i sent that message, the article was in a bad state with multi-nested tables. Anyway, why is it needed to split the table district-wise. As far as i know, similar articles for other states don't have this split. Keeping a single table allows one to sort on the various columns across all districts. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:59, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

@Sandeep kumar 83 Please read Wikipedia:Edit warring and self-revert your last edit. Also read Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle - two editors already objected to your split. It is high time you would want to discuss it first before further changes — DaxServer (t · m · c) 09:03, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

I see that user is editing logged out. One positive is that the districts are being updated to the latest 26. I'm thinking to just let it pass and just put a {{cleanup}} template and take care of merging myself when time permits. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

@Sandeep kumar 83 Now that your updating done, please merge back all the individual tables into one single table. For reference, see Category:Lists of constituencies of legislative assemblies of Indian states on how we format them. We put the election results in one single table as well, fyi — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:59, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed merge of List of former constituencies of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly into List of constituencies of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly

There are not many former constituencies. The list could be merged into the main article — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Support. Atleast for the current set of articles that have been created. When there are many more articles created, it can be WP:SPLIT. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:43, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

There is no need to merge as it is created on the lines of list of former constituencies of Loksabha India [[User:Sandeep kumar 83|Sandeep kumar 83]] ([[User talk:Sandeep kumar 83|talk]]) (talk) 14:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Support: Yes, it is better to merge here since they are only a few (and we can mention their creation and year of discontinuation if needed) 456legend(talk) 15:12, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

•   Y Merger complete. . Joyous! Noise! 03:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)