Talk:M. Kumaran Son of Mahalakshmi

Creation by a banned user is not in and of itself reason to delete. This content seems valuable (although it needs sourcing perhaps). Put it up for AfD if need be but don't speedy it. IMHO anyway. ++Lar: t/c 04:30, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Well, the only contributors to this article are Benzee and Prince_06 - who are both proven puppets of Prin. So he is unavailable to cite references or answer questions regarding this article. As to the article itself, this film is just a masala entertainer. It is not a classic to enter encyclopaedias. Anwar 04:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

I don't know what are the notability guidelines for movies, but the plot has been copied from [1]. - Mike Rosoft 09:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

That's a copyvio and reason to remove that part, (which I have done) but not the whole article. As for Anwar's first objection, I've addressed it at Wikipedia:Speedy_deletions#Thirupathi as it appears that someone may have taken this article under their wing. It wasn't my intent per se to do that but removing copyvio counts. I have no problem whatever in putting this up for AfD but I think insisting it's a speedy on what is ultimately a bureacratic point may not be the best approach. The speedy has been contested, validly or not, so AfD it. If it can't survive AfD no harm done, but if it does, typicailly it will be a better article at the end of it all. Putting it through AfD will address his second objection of non notability. ++Lar: t/c 15:02, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Trtyj.jpg

Image:Trtyj.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 15:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 18:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on M. Kumaran S/O Mahalakshmi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120120204653/http://www.raaga.com/channels/tamil/moviedetail.asp?mid=T0000641 to http://www.raaga.com/channels/tamil/moviedetail.asp?mid=T0000641

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)