Talk:Malacchi Esdale
Latest comment: 7 days ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 00:01, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that rugby sevens player Malacchi Esdale said the conditioning it took for him to play in the Olympics was "borderline crazy"?
- Source: The News Journal ("'The conditioning that you have to do to prepare yourself for this game is like, it's borderline crazy,' Esdale said.")
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Henry Charles Swan
- Comment: Realized I'm a bit late in nominating this; requesting a one-day extension as allowed by Wikipedia:Did you know/Guidelines.
Created by BeanieFan11 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 223 past nominations.
BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:45, 2 August 2024 (UTC).
- BeanieFan11, since we are so behind in reviews that the Nominations page isn't fully transcluding, noting that your QPQ should be done by 9 August, seven days after nomination, with a stretch date to 12 August, seven days from now. Please be sure to get it done by then. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 21:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Full review needed now that QPQ has been submitted. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- General eligibility:
- New enough: - A bit over seven days, but extension requested as per WP:DYKNEW.
- Long enough:
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ:
Overall: A bit over seven days, but extension requested as per WP:DYKNEW. Looks good to me otherwise, but I've neither nominated nor reviewed before, so requesting that someone else check this over please. Perfect4th (talk) 04:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Perfect4th: The one-day lateness gap here is small but not too big, so it looks acceptable to me. ミラP@Miraclepine 16:15, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Miraclepine: If there are no remaining issues, would this be good to go and be ready for a tick? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:47, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: Yes, nothing in the article has changed since the review and the only issue has been dealt with, so ALT0. ミラP@Miraclepine 14:46, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Miraclepine: If there are no remaining issues, would this be good to go and be ready for a tick? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:47, 29 August 2024 (UTC)