Talk:Malliswari (1951 film)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Pavanjandhyala in topic GA Review
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Malliswari (1951 film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
 | Malliswari (1951 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Malliswari (1951 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 16:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Right on topic, haven't long finished watching it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
""made a cute on-screen pair" -according to whom? Well?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Already it's written, "Narasimha Reddy said that Rama Rao and Bhanumathi "made a cute on-screen pair", adding that one cannot imagine anyone else as Nagaraju and Malleswari". Kailash29792 (talk) 12:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Or else Doctor, shall i remove the inverted commas there? I don't think so that removing them would make any difference. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Nah, I think the quotes can stay as there is no formal/neutral synonym for "cute". Kailash29792 (talk) 14:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- How about a good on-screen pair? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Nah, I think the quotes can stay as there is no formal/neutral synonym for "cute". Kailash29792 (talk) 14:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Or else Doctor, shall i remove the inverted commas there? I don't think so that removing them would make any difference. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
Article looks to be of sound quality and well documented given the period. Nicely done.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, Dr. Blofeld! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)