Talk:Manjari Fadnis

File:Manjari Phadnis still70.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Manjari Phadnis still70.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Manjari Phadnis still70.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:56, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Manjari Fadnis Charitable works.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 00:15, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

COI or PAID?

I queried User:Crispgatoglitz, who has recently created more than 100 of edits to the article (and to no other articles) if COI or PAID. Denied either. C is new to Wikipedia and needs connections to guidelines on how to reference. David notMD (talk) 18:24, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

I asked the same thing at User talk:Crispgatoglitz#Conflict of interest and the response on at User talk:Marchjuly#Regarding conflict of interest was that they have no COI and are just a fan. I'm willing to WP:AGF on that, but the Crispgatoglitz is new and a WP:SPA; so, they might not be very familiar with WP:BLP and other relevant policies/guidelines. Perhaps more eyes on the article (at least for a while) would be a good thing, so that content like what Hullaballoo Wolfowitz just removed here can trimmed out/discussed. None of those things automatically mean that Crispgatoglitz cannot edit the article and be WP:BOLD; only that he/she should be willing to be also WP:CAUTIOUS when making a major revision or adding lots of new content. Moreover, if content is then subsequently challenged by others and removed, then he/she should follow WP:DR. There's nothing wrong per se with a fan of Fadnis creating or editing content about her on Wikipedia as long as they follow WP:5P and are careful to avoid WP:FANCRUFT. My guess is that's Fadnis is probably notable, but that over the years IPs, etc. have added content that it probably a bit suspect and may need to be cleaned up. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:26, 27 July 2018 (UTC)