Wikipedia

Talk:Mileena

Latest comment: 5 months ago by Boneless Pizza! in topic more images
Learn more about this page
Former good articleMileena was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 10, 2012Good article nomineeListed
June 10, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article
edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Mileena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Mileena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Mileena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mileena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:46, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mileena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Brilliant

edit
Latest comment: 5 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Holy moly. This might be one of the biggest article that is full of listicles, trivial and passng mentions. I wonder who worked on this before. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 11:51, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I certainly do, but they're not active on Wikipedia anymore. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 04:09, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
This article needs improvement. (images, reliable sources etc.) Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 16:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago6 comments6 people in discussion

Mileena

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result: Strong consensus to delist. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:32, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Article has whole sections without sourcing, and several vastly overdetailed sections that can and should be cut down. Article also overrelies on lists, and some of the cited sources do not entirely say what they are cited for, a standard with Niemti's articles. Overall the whole thing needs a vast rewrite. Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:07, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • Delist Despite the recent clean ups of Beemer69, it needs a lot more and the article is HUGE. Some sections are a bit outdated, overdetailed and unsourced. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 01:09, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Delist. This was GA’d a decade ago when the “bigger is better” mentality was the norm for good VG articles. But now it’s a ton of cruft and unimportant detail mixed in with some useful content. I’ve been just taking out the trash for starters, but it’s definitely time to put up the scaffolding. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 03:44, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Delist: As a person who promoted this to GA in the first place nearly 11 years ago, (wow, has it really been that long?) I would have to be in support of a delist today. I'm going to have to echo Beemer69 on the whole "bigger is better" mentality, along with the fact that at the time, I felt everything was so well-sourced, well-written and so detailed, but this was still during my early days on Wikipedia, and standards have changed since 11 years ago. Maybe this can become GA again someday, should take the time to fix up the article, but for now, a delist is the way to go. MoonJet (talk) 07:52, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Delist It needs a serious cleanup job. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:13, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mortal Kombat 1 Sources

edit
  1. https://www.pcgamer.com/mortal-kombat-1-review/ (Role in story)
    1. https://www.gamespot.com/reviews/mortal-kombat-1-review-new-era-familiar-kombat/1900-6418115/ (Praise to Mileena and Kitana's relationship)
  2. https://www.pcinvasion.com/mortal-kombat-1-review-a-krowning-event/
  3. https://www.eurogamer.net/mortal-kombat-1-review
  4. https://hardcoregamer.com/reviews/review-mortal-kombat-1/470999/
  5. https://comicbook.com/gaming/news/mortal-kombat-1-review/ (Tarkat as virus)
  6. https://butwhytho.net/2023/09/mortal-kombat-1-review/
  7. https://www.gameinformer.com/review/mortal-kombat-1/gory-glory (Design and gameplay)
  8. https://www.gamereactor.eu/mortal-kombat-1-1305813/ (Very different character)

more images

edit
Latest comment: 5 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I think more images should be added to show her visual character progression. Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 19:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oh trust me, this article is wayyy worst than the article we edit warred before. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 00:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mileena&oldid=1225365291"