Talk:Mjolnir and Stormbreaker
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mjolnir and Stormbreaker article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What if we made this page about both Mjolnir and Stormbreaker?
editJust thinking outside the box, but what if we titled this Mjolnir and Stormbreaker (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (with redirects from each individual topic), and made the article about both weapons? BD2412 T 17:30, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- @InfiniteNexus: what do you think? BD2412 T 17:32, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- I wouldn't be opposed. The title does look a little off, but I can't think of a better alternative. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:11, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- How about the state of the article now? BD2412 T 14:50, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- The draft is indeed more comprehensive than it was a month ago, so I'd be more comfortable with a mainspace move, but so far it's been just you and me talking. I don't know if anyone else actively watches this page (I doubt it, to be honest), so I'll drop a notice at WT:MCU to get more opinions. Recall that the last time something like this happened, there were notability concerns raised. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:48, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- I would note that at the moment there are only sixteen sources on the page, and I'm sure there are plenty more out there that can be added. BD2412 T 13:58, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- And I'm sure there are also plenty of sources that discuss Jonathan and Stormbreaker's cultural impact, scientific accuracy, etc. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:36, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- I think it's basically ready for mainspace (absent images, which will need to be added after it is moved). BD2412 T 16:29, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- It doesn't look like anyone else is interested in chiming in... InfiniteNexus (talk) 07:38, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I think it's basically ready for mainspace (absent images, which will need to be added after it is moved). BD2412 T 16:29, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- And I'm sure there are also plenty of sources that discuss Jonathan and Stormbreaker's cultural impact, scientific accuracy, etc. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:36, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- I would note that at the moment there are only sixteen sources on the page, and I'm sure there are plenty more out there that can be added. BD2412 T 13:58, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- The draft is indeed more comprehensive than it was a month ago, so I'd be more comfortable with a mainspace move, but so far it's been just you and me talking. I don't know if anyone else actively watches this page (I doubt it, to be honest), so I'll drop a notice at WT:MCU to get more opinions. Recall that the last time something like this happened, there were notability concerns raised. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:48, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- How about the state of the article now? BD2412 T 14:50, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- I wouldn't be opposed. The title does look a little off, but I can't think of a better alternative. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:11, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Possible page images
editI have one of two scenes in mind to clip for the page image, showing both Stormbreaker and Mjolnir in the same frame.
One would be a frame from this iconic moment from Avengers: Endgame, in which Steve Rogers momentarily holds Stormbreaker while Thor holds Mjolnir.
The other would be a frame from the final scene of Love and Thunder, which Love wields Stormbreaker while Thor wields the reconstructed Mjolnir.
Any preferences? BD2412 T 02:21, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Article title doesn't need the dab
editGiven it has both weapon's as the article title now, there is nothing else at Mjolnir and Stormbreaker so this would be the WP:PRIMARY. Individual redirects for each weapon probably need the dab, but this title doesn't. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:18, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- Strictly speaking, shouldn't Mjolnir and Stormbreaker point to Mjolnir (comics), though? BD2412 T 17:27, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- Stormbreaker (comics) as it stands redirects to Beta Ray Bill's article. An article with both in its title (as this is) would be inappropriate to point to just Mjolnir (comics). - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:37, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- I would also question whether Stormbreaker (comics) should redirects to Beta Ray Bill rather than Mjolnir (comics), but given the current setup I suppose I would not object to this article being moved. BD2412 T 18:41, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree this page can be moved to just Mjolnir and Stormbreaker, given it's now an unnecessary dab. We can just hatnote to the two comics articles/redirects. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:02, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, I see the direction the consensus is going here. BD2412 T 01:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree this page can be moved to just Mjolnir and Stormbreaker, given it's now an unnecessary dab. We can just hatnote to the two comics articles/redirects. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:02, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- I would also question whether Stormbreaker (comics) should redirects to Beta Ray Bill rather than Mjolnir (comics), but given the current setup I suppose I would not object to this article being moved. BD2412 T 18:41, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- Stormbreaker (comics) as it stands redirects to Beta Ray Bill's article. An article with both in its title (as this is) would be inappropriate to point to just Mjolnir (comics). - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:37, 14 December 2022 (UTC)