Talk:Murder 2

File:Murder-2-poster.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Murder-2-poster.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?

Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Murder 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130605052846/http://boxofficeindia.com/boxnewsdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=3944&nCat= to http://boxofficeindia.com/boxnewsdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=3944&nCat=

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Verbose plot descriptions

"At the church, he comes into contact with Priya (Jacqueline Fernandez), a model. Arjun seems to kiss her initially without her consent, but she later gives in and both of them end up at her home. There they end up stripping each other and passionately smooching. Priya eventually opens her bra and tries to tease Arjun. Arjun ends up opening her shorts and devours her with animal-like hunger, and sex is implied (offscreen) both of them eventually end up climaxing and Priya reveals to harbor romantic feelings for Arjun. However, Arjun only lusts after Priya's marvelous body and asks her to find someone else if she wants love, as Arjun can only have a no-strings attached relationship, and nothing else."

Though accurate to the plot and screenplay, this adds nothing to the summary. The whole thing comes of as adolescent and perverted in a way. Samarth agnihotri (talk) 01:37, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Emraan Hashmi promoting Murder 2.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:13, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Prashant Narayanan

@77Survivor: Statements from actors are not really due when concerning basic aspects of films such as remake rights et. al. especially when that aspect has been specifically denied by the filmmakers and the director (WP:WEIGHT and WP:UNDUE applies); that is definite enough for the WP:LEAD to limit it to a counter statement from the makers but not to doubly counter the counter as it is non-standard per precedent (as is the usual case for counters in leads).

The additions are perhaps better suited for the body but considering the statement reads (emphasis mine): "It was also a remake from some South Korean film, called Chaser." It would, as expected, appear that the supporting actor is himself unsure. We do not air the views of the scores of people involved in a film, the most relevant people working in a film are the director, producer and writer [and the like] as far as plagiarism controversies are concerned and as far as I know we do not extend the courtesy with respect to that to uninvolved film actors (i.e. not involved in the making as producers etc). Gotitbro (talk) 11:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)