Talk:Muslim Women's National Network Australia

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Powertothepeople in topic quality sources

quality sources

edit

I am having trouble finding "quality sources" to show what this organisation has been doing. Not because the organisation hasn't been doing things, but because the reputable sources either focus on bigger topics to which WMNAA is only a small mention rather core interest, or more detail is found in sources that might not be considered reputable or unbiased.

There are many government sources that list WMNNA communications and directories as an organisation that provides support and advocacy for Muslim women. There are mentions in official reports and documentation on women's issues and muslim issues. There are books listed on google that briefly mention the organisation. There are many newpaper articles that mention the organisation when speaking to one of their spokespeople on controversial Muslim feminist topics (however the main article is about the issue, not the organisation). There are posts on facebook promoting their events. Etc. This organisation has obviously been busy, however there is not any big write up about what they've done that would be easy to cite. I am not sure what to do in this situation. Many of these documents would need to be manually cited - which is time consuming - and still may not be accepted as a "quality source."

Here is a list of examples:

I'm not sure what to do in this situation. Powertothepeople (talk) 01:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply