Talk:Nicobar Islands

untitled

The map could be infinitely improved. A higher resolution image is required on the Main Article's front page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.232.178.177 (talk) 11:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

untitled 2

Why doesn't India allow visitors to Nicobar islands?

I was wondering that myself. -- Beland 20:51, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This seemed worth copying here from the reference desk:

Reading some recent coverage about tsunami aftermath in the Nicobar Islands, I was puzzled about why the local government might be prohibiting foreigners from traveling to the island. Union territory says that the islands are ruled directly by the federal government, which seems to contradict the CNN article. [1] says, "Travel to the Nicobar Islands is restricted, and only Indian nationals engaged in research may visit. Some exceptions are made for tourists with special permits." [2] says: "The Nicobar Islands are not open to visiting foreigners, whether scholars or tourists. Indian citizens need a special permit - which is hardly ever granted." [3] mentions the island's lieutenant governor.

So I'm wondering why the Indian government restricts travel to the islands. Is it for ecological reasons, to maintain tribal culture, something to do with the island's past as a prison, or some other historical or political context we're missing?

What is the actual structure of the island's non-tribal government?

The tribal/non-tribal population and protected land area figures also seem to vary a lot from source to source.

The situtation on the islands seems to be in a little bit of flux because of the tsunami, but it would be nice to get a handle on how things were right beforehand. Thanks for any insight you can lend. -- Beland 21:36, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hmm, there was a segment on Channel 4 News a few days ago, I think about the Nicobar Islands. In this case the government was trying to keep modernity away from the few remaining aboriginal islanders, whose culture was clearly teetering on a precipice. I think the relief consisted of chucking coconuts at the islanders from a fleeting boat, while they chucked pointy sticks back at the boat. So your cultural contamination theory seemed to be supported by that. -- John Fader 23:04, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Have a look at http://www.andaman.org/ - it has some related info on travel restrictions to the Andamans. But I think in this particular case, it may have a lot to do with not wanting people killed by the inhabitants, who are famously hostile to outsiders. - Mustafaa 23:06, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Interesting -- not so much for ecological or conservational reasons than for the safety of citizens and foreigners? Peter O. (Talk) 23:16, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)

This BBC article suggest that some islands are off-limit because of military reasons. Furthermore, this article states that there were 93,000 visits by tourists to the Andaman and Nicobar islands, but it may be that in fact these tourists all went to the Andamans. -- Jitse Niesen 14:31, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I believe the offical reasons are because of the provisions of the Protection of Aboriginal Tribes (Regulation), 1956 legislation, which professes to control/restrict access to designated "tribal areas" for the protection and preservation of the indigenous cultures. The Nicobar district is designated as an Integrated Tribal District. On a similar basis, access to certain parts of the Andamans is also restricted, particularly North Sentinel Island and the Jarawa tribal reserve. Adherence to these ideals is a little haphazard it would seem, since the Govt built a road thru the latter reserve in the 70s which opened the area up somewhat.--cjllw | TALK 09:46, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

Obligatory conspiracy theory: I wonder what the US State Department is so concerned with the Nicobar Islands for; WikiLeaks' "CableGate" leak shows the Nicobar Islands ranked 13th among countries in most records concerning them... more than India itself! See for yourself at http://public.tableausoftware.com/views/tags/Country 174.49.228.112 (talk) 06:48, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Tarasa Dwip/Teressa

There are two articles, one titled Tarasa Dwip and the other Teressa (Nicobar Islands). But everything I can find points to these being the same island. Unless someone can show me otherwise, I'll merge one into the other. Murderbike 04:16, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Weird dates

In the following sentence something needs to be checked:

...they were repeatedly abandoned due to outbreaks of malaria: 1784 - 1807/09, 1830 - 1834 and finally from 1848 gradually for good. Between 1778 and 1783, Austria attempted to establish a colony on the islands on the mistaken assumption that Denmark had abandoned its claims to the islands.

Why would Austria attempt to take over more than hundred years EARLIER?Mohonu (talk) 02:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

WP:INDIA Banner/Andaman and Nicobar Islands workgroup Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Andaman and Nicobar Islands workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Andaman and Nicobar Islands or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 05:44, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

better map please

ONe of the places where wiki is far inferior to professional published encyclopedias is maps. The map shown has poor resolution and does not show where India is in relation to the islands. Something like this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bay_of_Bengal_map.png

but with the islands darkened.

72.82.57.163 (talk) 00:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Possibly will be important

Earthquake--Jimbo Wales (talk) 19:59, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nicobar Islands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050404001731/http://www.colonialvoyage.com/DanishP.html to http://www.colonialvoyage.com/DanishP.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110709082928/http://www.andaman.org/NICOBAR/text.htm to http://www.andaman.org/NICOBAR/text.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:57, 22 January 2018 (UTC)