Talk:Nil Battey Sannata

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nil Battey Sannata/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dharmadhyaksha (talk · contribs) 11:45, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

That's one pleasing new movie I happened to see in ages and would be great reviewing it. I will make minor changes myself and put major comments in here. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:45, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Yes, the film's simply a delight. Looking forward to your comments. NumerounovedantTalk 12:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

• One non-free image with rationale is good, other three images from Commons are also properly licensed. But these three images are missing WP:ALT
• filmcentric.wordpress.com is not WP:RS
• Refs 3, 5 and 7 do not have date or publisher or such things.
• The "Tamil Remake" section is undue. It can sit within "reception" by cutting down unnecessary details of schedule.
• Soundtrack infobox is useless, remove it.
• Use |all_music= when musician is same for all songs.
• Use |total_length= too.
• Use "Rohan and Vinayak" and not "Rohan & Vinayak", unless "Rohan & Vinayak" is their proper name of team or such.
• Soundtrack's reception is missing.

Will ping you once the comments have been addressed. NumerounovedantTalk 18:15, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

@Dharmadhyaksha: All done. NumerounovedantTalk 16:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

@Dharmadhyaksha: Also, I forgot to mention I think that the remake section is perfectly fine and doesn't have any unnecessary details as such and would not really belong in the "Reception" section. NumerounovedantTalk 15:35, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

One sentence; the film is remade and is under production as blah blah with blah blah in blah blah roles; that's all is needed and is relevant to this article.

• publisher of ref 3 missing
• thereviewmonk.com, how is this RS?

@Dharmadhyaksha:Fixed all. NumerounovedantTalk 11:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

@Dharmadhyaksha: Do you any more comments? NumerounovedantTalk 15:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

@Dharmadhyaksha: A little reminder. `NumerounovedantTalk 04:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

• Amma Kanakku is now nowhere mentioned by name except lead. Also, I just noticed that Amma Kanakku has already released. So adding a line about how it fared is needed. Your initial prose of the related section gave impression that it is still under production. Fixed this myself. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 15:13, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
• "English: Nil Divided by Silence" has no reference. And so does "Uttar Pradesh slang for "Good For Nothing"".
• What is "The New Classmate"? Was it released under that name in other countries? Not mentioned anywhere except lead and no ref for that.
• Instead of "matriculation year" SSC can be used as we have a dedicated article to it.
• "Troubled by her daughter's rebellious attitude" Rebellious? I must have forgotten some bits of the film, but what was rebellious in her?
• Wikilink "District Commissioner" to District collector.
• "and the duo finishes their matriculation" --> "and the duo finish their matriculation"
• "For a year, Nitesh and I worked on the script along with screenwriters". This is no exceptional statement to be quoted. It can be paraphrased.
• The fact that the film was distributed by Eros International finds no mention other than lead.
• The article gives no time frames on production of the film. Please check if that can be added.

@Dharmadhyaksha:Fixed all. NumerounovedantTalk 10:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

The six good article criteria checks

• 1a - Done
• 1b - Done
• 2a - Done
• 2b - Done
• 2c - Done
• 2d - Done
• 3a - Done
• 3b - Done
• 4 - Done
• 5 - Done

6a - Done

6b - Done

After minor copyeditings and corrections I think this this now can be a GA. Congratulations! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC)