Talk:Northern Black Polished Ware
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Edavis92199.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Northern Black Polished Ware. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140101140624/http://a.harappa.com/sites/g/files/g65461/f/CulturesSocietiesIndusTrad.pdf to http://a.harappa.com/sites/g/files/g65461/f/CulturesSocietiesIndusTrad.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
adding reference
editadding the content here until issue is resolved
[1] Zombie gunner (talk) 06:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Carlos Eduardo Aramayo B. (talk · contribs), im calling you here for the resolution for an edit dispute, above is the reference for the NBPW date provided for Ayodhya stated in Michel Danino's article, but the पाटलिपुत्र (talk · contribs) has claimed that
You are adding unsourced contentious content [1], making false edit summaries [2], and misrepresenting sources [3]. Please improve your sourcing and be more careful about how you represent them.
can you please examine and varify if the source and info is what is claimed by the user, I'm adding the quoted text below. Zombie gunner (talk) 06:59, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Zombie gunner (talk · contribs), unfortunatelly Danino´s paper does not show the list of radiocarbon datings, it´s essencial to find the original publication of them. Maybe they can be found in the book by A. K. Sharma, but for the moment it´s not accessible to my search. I'm not saying Danino is wrong, but I think it´s needed a confirmation. --Carlos Eduardo Aramayo B. (talk) 02:03, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ Danino, Michel. "A Timeline of Ayodhya": Period I: Northern Black Polished Ware (NBPW) c. 1300 BC - 300 BC Period I: The Human activity at the [Ram Janambhumi - Babri Masjid] dates back to the circa: thirteenth century B.C. on the bases of the scientific dating method providing the only archaeological evidence for such an early dating of the human occupation at the site (Sharma 2011:48). People using Northern Black Polished Ware (NBPW) a pottery type generally associated with the urbanization of the ganges plains were the first occupants of the site at Ayodhya.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help)
How it made
edit2409:4072:908:A9DE:A518:D683:7F15:4765 (talk) 17:55, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, IP user. Talk pages like this one are generally used for discussing improvements to the article itself (i.e., "I think that second paragraph needs more references"), not as a forum about the topic. General questions like this one are best asked at the Wikipedia reference desks.
- Based on my skim of the article, the answer to your question is likely "we don't really know" (which the answer to far too many questions). But the reference desks are worth a try. Thanks, 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2024 (UTC)