![]() | A fact from Over ground worker appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DYK nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 13:43, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ...
that over ground workers have the responsibility of creating alienation?Source:... the over ground workers conduct psywar to alienate people from the government- ALT1:...
that over ground workers in Kashmir have the responsibility of creating alienation? - ALT2:...
that Jammu and Kashmir Police categorise "anybody who supports the militants" as an over ground worker?source:Jammu and Kashmir Police categorises “anybody who supports the militants” as an OGW, The police categorise “anybody who supports the militants” as an OGW. A person providing a safe house, passage, information or acting as a messenger...
- ALT1:...
- Reviewed: Security Consultancy Wing
Created by DiplomatTesterMan (talk). Self-nominated at 11:03, 6 May 2020 (UTC).
- DiplomatTesterMan, it's been over three weeks since you nominated this, well beyond the time when a QPQ review should have been submitted. Please do one right away. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:44, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- Doing just now. DTM (talk) 04:43, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- qpq started. DTM (talk) 05:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- Full review needed now that QPQ has been submitted. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting: - n
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: --evrik (talk) 01:44, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- evrik Awww, so I just have to look for an interesting dyk? I will give it a try but this doesn't look too hopeful. Thanks. DTM (talk) 13:41, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Did you see anything interesting, hooky, when glancing through the article? DTM (talk) 13:42, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- I would strengthen the lead. Put something in there as to why this term matters. I think that would give you a good hook. --evrik (talk) 14:00, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Although I did make some additions to the article, I am coming up short with a hook that seems hooky enough. You can close this nom if you want. Thanks. DTM (talk) 07:17, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Evrik: ping DTM (talk) 11:30, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- @DiplomatTesterMan: Where does the term come from? Overgound versus under ground? --evrik (talk) 12:56, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- evrik, I checked online and couldn't find anything about the origin of the term which was disappointing. Anyway, here are two alt hooks for consideration, alt4 with the overground/underground part suggested:
- ALT3: ... that if in Kashmir militants are fish, over ground workers are the water? "... if militants are seen as fish, OGWs are the water that ensures their survival,"
- ALT4: ... that over ground workers act as the eyes and ears of the under ground militants in Kashmir? According to the Police Department's Crime Gazette, OGWs "act as eyes and ears of the underground militants",
- DTM (talk) 14:59, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- @DiplomatTesterMan: Where does the term come from? Overgound versus under ground? --evrik (talk) 12:56, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- I am approving Alt 4, though if the promoter wants Alt3, I'm okay with that as well. --evrik (talk) 03:18, 17 June 2020 (UTC)