Talk:Piracha
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editGood but verbose article. Is it possible to cut it down to material just regarding Pirachas ? Dirgni (talk) 21:37, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Reference content removed
editReference content removed vide Revision on 28 October 2009 by Otterathome
| “ | As for the Piracha , they too, are Khatri, who converted to Islam very early.[1] | ” |
The Gazetteer of the Rawalpindi District 1893 and 94 however records that
| “ | they are converted Hindus and seem to be much the same as Khojas " •[2] | ” |
| “ | But in the north west Punjab and the northern districts of the North west Frontier Province , the term Paracha is preferred by Hindu traders converted to Islam , so that where the Parachas are recognised and wealthy caste , Khoja is used for miscellanaeous Muhammadan traders ,chiefly hawkers and Pedlers , or at least petty traders , while in the eastern districts in the Derajat, where the Khojas are commercially important , paracha is used for [3] | ” |
The Gazetteer of the Shahpur District 1897 records that-
| “ | The Musalmans generally use the Arabic Character.The Musalman Khoja and Piracha traders however mostly keep their accounts in Hindi .•[4] | ” |
References
edit- ^ Christophe Jaffrelot, Gillian Beaumont (2004). Anthem Press (ed.). A history of Pakistan and its origins (illustrated ed.). p. 209. ISBN 1843311496. Translated by Gillian Beaumont
- ^ Gazetteer of the Rawalpindi District 1893-94, Punjab Government, 2001 Sang-e-Meel Publications, Lahore. Page 104
- ^ Denzil Ibbetson, Edward MacLagan, H.A. Rose "A Glossary of The Tribes & Casts of The Punjab & North-West Frontier Province", 1911 AD, Page 537, Vol II,
- ^ Gazetteer of the Shahpur District 1897, Punjab Government, Sang-e-Meel Publications, Lahore. Page 91
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Yoenit (talk) 11:33, 25 December 2010 (UTC) Yoenit (talk) 11:33, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
- See my edit summaries for the sources found. Yoenit (talk) 11:33, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Problems
editDear all, hi. There seem to be two main problems with this article- (a) it doesnt give adequate refs/citations and those that are there are not formated properly and (b) the sections/main text needs to be broken up into managable sections. I would request that the creator, or someone interested in this topic, might pl take a detailed look at it and fix. Am doing a little bit to help things along. Thanks, Khani100 (talk) 12:09, 16 April 2012 (UTC)Khani100
- Helo, I have today removed many non-notable names from list of supposedly 'notable people'. Please, ONLY add those names of people who are demonstrably notable and already have an existing Wikipedia article. Thanks you. 39.54.180.86 (talk) 21:29, 18 October 2014 (UTC)Prof retd Hilda Khan, Pakistan
Article uses Hindu and Hindi interchangeably
editThe article, despite its sources makes little sense. How can something like an ancient caste be of "hindi" origin when the language is less than a few centuries old. I am guessing its to do with using the word Hindi and Hindu interchangeably. --2A02:8084:901:4D00:2997:7B61:A080:F5C8 (talk) 09:33, 7 May 2019 (UTC)