This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
@Ponyo: I do not know, if this type of references are profitable for wikipedia (123), but for now I have found these, where sample the date of day and month of birthday. The year itself is 1986 as it is included on the main page as a category. --190.159.239.204 (talk) 18:32, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
The inclusion of the category is in error as numerous dates have been presented, none of which have been supported by reliable sources. I've removed it in accordance with WP:BLPCAT. The three links you included above are primary sources, which fall short of the published secondary sources which are preferable in these cases. Even if they could be used, they offer conflicting information; the first two are posted on February 18th and the third is posted on February 17th.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots19:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
I see you've been doing this for 6 years... First is September, not February. Secondly the first 2 sources denotes that she added (in past tense, for his birthdays) for which it was the previous day. And third are not references to place the main page, mention was for you to realize, that the date 17/09/1986 is correct and not false. --190.159.239.204 (talk) 19:22, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Yes, as a Wikipedia admin I have been enforcing our policies regarding BLP for several years; it is also one of the most pertinent reasons why the community passed my request for adminship. At no point in time should we need to cobble together sources or make assumptions when adding such information to BLPs - see WP:SYNTHESIS and WP:OR. Unless there are multiple sources meeting Wikipedia's reliable sourcing criteria explicitly verifying an exact date, per policy the date is not included.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots19:40, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
