Talk:Ringyuichon Vashum
Latest comment: 3 years ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Ringyuichon Vashum appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 March 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 20:24, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
( )
.jpg)
Ringyuichon Vashum
- ... that microcredit, which Ringyuichon Vashum (pictured) arranged for Tangkhul Nagas, was "one of the most significant instrumental aspects in empowering women"? Source: "one of the most significant instrumental aspects in empowering women"
- ALT1:... that Ringyuichon Vashum's (pictured) work showed that microcredit was "one of the most significant instrumental aspects in empowering women"? Source: "one of the most significant instrumental aspects in empowering women"
- Reviewed: Red Steer
Created by Victuallers (talk). Self-nominated at 16:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC).
This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline, the image is suitably licensed, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:09, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, Cwmhiraeth and Victuallers, the cited source is flagged for me as a predatory journal. Is it reliable? Eddie891 Talk Work 02:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Eddie891 Good spot. I searched some more and found three people/bots oozing to each other about what a great piece of research it was. It should have occurred to me that it was a predatory journal but I had assumed the vagueness in the journal's name because it was not from a US/UK etc familiar source. I deleted the stuff from this ref and the article tipped below 1500 chars so if Cwmhiraeth will forgive me for wasting time then I withdraw this nom. Sorry Ringyuichon. Victuallers (talk) 18:07, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Good news, Ringyuichon! I have added a couple of sentences and the article is long enough now. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
