Talk:Salt N' Pepper

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Bollyjeff in topic GA Review
Former good article nomineeSalt N' Pepper was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 14, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Salt N' Pepper/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bollyjeff (talk · contribs) 16:33, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I am going to review this article. BollyJeff || talk 16:33, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I am going to have to quick-fail this for the following reasons:

  • Some unreliable sources - ex: Indiaglitz, blogs, etc
  • Some misleading names in references - ex: 5 citations from moviebuzz.org ( a blog) claimed to be official website
  • Some major claims are unsourced - ex: "Salt N Pepper successfully completed in all major centers,and considered as one of the biggest hit of the year."
  • Some missing content normal for film articles - ex: no box office numbers
  • Some diasambig links were present
  • Use of table for cast list against MOS
  • The major contibutor is banned user
  • The nominator has made only 1 edit to article
In short, it is not up to par with GA status or other film GAs. It needs major work, and judging by the list of contributors, that is not likely to happen soon. If someone is willing to put in the work, it can be renominated at some point in the further, but right now it is not close to GA. BollyJeff || talk 17:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: