Talk:Sansa Stark

Proposed merge with Sansa Lannister

Same character across two different articles. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:44, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Obviously the merger needs to happen. - FakirNL (talk) 09:22, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

We know that, but which title should be used? I suggest this one. Nikkimaria (talk) 11:42, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Done. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:09, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Should there be a sub-section talking about her depiction on television?

There are several differences between her characterization on television and that in the books, not to mention that the TV version is somewhat older than the book version -- 24.212.139.102 (talk) 02:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

As for "older," TV-Tyrion refers to TV-Sansa as "fourteen" before their wedding, so she's roughly the same age in the show and book. Smarter? More proactive? Wa-hay more fun to watch? Heck yes. But we'd have to find secondary sources that say so or else the content will probably get chucked by delete-happy Wikieditors. Darkfrog24 (talk) 05:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

I do not understand why the tv Sansa is only talked about here since season 4 not from Season 1 until 6 like others — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.206.155.74 (talk) 14:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

out-of-character actor image

Because using out-of-character actor photos as illustrations of characters makes no sense, I have removed the OOC actor photo. Copyright-free images of either a drawing/illustration of the character or of the actor in character - if they can be found/acquired - would be very welcome additions to the article.--TyrS 06:47, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

RfC on Oathkeeper

There's an RS RfC on the Oathkeeper talk page concerning book chapter information—two of which are Sansa POV—and appropriate sourcing. Participation (and fresh voices) would be welcome. Darkfrog24 (talk) 05:27, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Sansa Stark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160307150640/http://grrm.livejournal.com/164794.html to http://grrm.livejournal.com/164794.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sagawards.org/awards/nominees-and-recipients/18th-annual-screen-actors-guild-awards
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://movies.about.com/od/awards/a/2011-Scream-Awards.htm
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6FaZ1wnUQ?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youngartistawards.org%2Fnoms34.html to http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms34.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150714065122/http://www.empireonline.com/awards2015/winners/hero.asp to http://www.empireonline.com/awards2015/winners/hero.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Adding content regarding Ramsey

I've added content regarding the motivations for sansa killing ramsey which includes avenging : her abuse Her families betrayal her brothers Rickon's murder

Twice I've been reverted

This should and will be included. I will keep on putting it if I must as its important information and not unnecessary I was directed to the talk page to obtain "consensus" but consensus is worth tosh just because editors with 1000 plus edits keep reverting things that are not incorrect . Hpdh4 10:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by HPDEATHLYHALLOWS4 (talk • contribs)