Talk:Sham marriage

cleanup needed

This article requires cleanup - looks like something out of a government catologue or brochure. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs 12:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Merge

What would be the difference with Marriage of convenience? Texts are already equivalent. --VanBurenen (talk) 18:38, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Marriage has historically been viewed as a economic or political contract -- it is way off base historically to suggest that this constitutes a 'sham' because it does not conform to modern conceptions of a 'romantic' marriage! 192.246.232.143 (talk) 22:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

I think Marriage of convenience is ancient fake marriage but Sham marriage is modern.--Player23 (talk) 04:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sham marriage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091028085213/http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/east_king/bel/news/65882672.html to http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/east_king/bel/news/65882672.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Globalize article

This article mixes and confuses the situations in various countries, so I added the Globalize tag because the article seems to merge or mix the law of several countries without distinguishing what is common among different countries concerned and what is specific to particular countries. Generally it seems a sham marriage is a form of fraud, primarily immigration fraud, as the intent is to gain residency or citizenship by deceiving immigration officials. However, the situation is different in different countries. In New Zealand a marriage does not automatically confer residency or citizenship and applicants need to demonstrate a genuine committed relationship exists too. This sort of thing can be difficult to demonstrate for some culturally arranged marriages, which leads to complaints that immigration officials are declining visas for, and even separating, genuinely married couples. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 08:15, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

What is an acid test of a genuine non-sham marriage in North India

Say you are a sitting judge in a case where a 'sham marriage for the purpose of financial and sexual exploitation' is alleged by the foreign wife of a North Indian man. The man has an ex-wife from whom he is 'divorced on paper'. How would you determine whether the marriage is sham or not? Any thoughts? 2402:D000:8138:198D:FFAF:8A2:9587:3332 (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)