Talk:Silk Smitha

Biography assessment rating comment

WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives

Definitely a Start class.

Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. —Yamara ✉ 03:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Removed unwarranted references to pornography

I have removed unfair categories. Smitha played erotic roles but she cannot be described as a "porn star". That is bringing things a bit too far.

The fact is, as every South Indian knows, that Silk Smitha was a very good actress. She won an award with the movie Spadhikam and in another movie she played the role of an overwhelmed housewife to perfection.

The problem was that directors gave her mostly erotic roles, usually as a "bad girl", or a seducer, or the girlfriend of the "bad guy". But all this doesn't make Silk Smitha a "porn actress". Please give more respect to her memory. Signed: Shiva 122.162.165.45 (talk) 14:00, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

She's been actually identified as a soft-porn actress by reliable sources, not just "mildly erotic" by Indian standards (that would be Madhuri Dixit, I reckon, as even Mallika Sherawat is way above that mildness). Take Roopa Swaminathan's book for an example, which was reviewed by The Hindu. I do have respect for her, and to have that respect I don't need to rely on denials. Who says a soft-porn actress can't have respect? That sounds a bit like prejudiced, though I am sure the comment was made with good intentions. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 13:28, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Read WP:REDFLAG, that is an extraordinary claim, if she were alive WP:BLP would apply. Just because someone is dead doesnot mean we have the right to potray them anyway we want. There is not a single movie that could be considered to warrnt such a categoryTaprobanus (talk) 18:47, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Silk Smitha.jpg

Image:Silk Smitha.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:52, 25 October 2007 (UTC):From Chandra mohan Reddy R:AS per my opinion Silk Smith is very good actress and very honest and smart and good girl she entertained a lot of all over Indian audence with her incredible performence so we have to give respect to het we should not blame I hopy every body can understand.

File:Silk Smitha Still (12).jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Silk Smitha Still (12).jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:29, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Smitha22.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Smitha22.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:05, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

File:SILK SMITHA.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:SILK SMITHA.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:52, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Actress SILK.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Actress SILK.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:26, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Editorial Liberty - references to Dirty Picture

I noticed in the section related to her death the following

" Death"

In 1996, Smitha was found dead inn her Chennai apartment. In the prior year she had been trying to move her career to become a film producer.[12][13] Financial problems, a disillusionment in love and an alcohol dependency apparently led to depression. It is suspected that Smitha committed suicide by poisoning herself. Very much like the movie The Dirty Picture featuring Vidya Balan

I have removed the reference to Dirty Pictures because it is known that the movie was based on Smitha's life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.248.151.250 (talk) 01:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

On "Her striking looks burdened her with uninvited attention"

Assuming this is referring to sexual assault or harassment, it would likely be best to phrase this information as such (e.g. "She experienced sexual harassment/assault,") rather than implying that she brought it on herself by being physically attractive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tshahe (talk • contribs) 18:10, 26 November 2014‎ (UTC)

I think it wanted to say that a lot of people around her started to fall in love with her or started to desire her. There's a very Indian way of looking at or saying these things. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 14:20, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Silk Smitha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110929234545/http://movies.ndtv.com/movie_story.aspx?ID=ENTEN20110184987&keyword=bollywood&subcatg=MOVIESINDIA&nid=136920 to http://movies.ndtv.com/movie_story.aspx?ID=ENTEN20110184987&keyword=bollywood&subcatg=MOVIESINDIA&nid=136920

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Silk Smitha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131217120609/http://cinema.maalaimalar.com/2013/12/14213439/silk-smitha-cinema-history.html to http://cinema.maalaimalar.com/2013/12/14213439/silk-smitha-cinema-history.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131221172406/http://cinema.maalaimalar.com/2013/12/16224107/cinema-history.html to http://cinema.maalaimalar.com/2013/12/16224107/cinema-history.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140114224641/http://cinema.maalaimalar.com/2013/12/15203008/Silk-smitha-cinema-history.html to http://cinema.maalaimalar.com/2013/12/15203008/Silk-smitha-cinema-history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:45, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Silk Smitha in Sadma.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:21, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

For Rewritten a statement without a suitable article

you have changed an information which was cited with a suitable reference without concerning the article. If you try to rewrite a statement, provide suitable article at the end of the statement. TheRealAkash005 (talk) 12:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)