Talk:Skip Walker

Latest comment: 11 months ago by WikiOriginal-9 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Skip Walker/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 06:54, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (No original research):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Notes

edit

That's all I think. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 07:24, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

BeanieFan11. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 13:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
BeanieFan11. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
@WikiOriginal-9: You can mark any of the remaining GA nominations which I have not gotten to (that you've reviewed) as withdrawn for now ... too busy to get to any currently... and who knows... I might need them for next year's competition   Thanks, BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:04, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
@BeanieFan11: Per WP:GAN/I#N3:
"Withdrawing: To withdraw a nomination before the review has begun, remove the GA nominee template from the article talk page. To withdraw a nomination after the review has begun, let the reviewer know; the reviewer will then fail the nomination."
Just confirming that you want me to fail these before I do it. You're going to get a bunch of talk page messages. :)
Thanks, ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 02:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
@BeanieFan11 and WikiOriginal-9:, are you opposed to me taking over this nomination? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Gonzo fan2007: Sure, you can take it if you like. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
WikiOriginal-9, I think I have addressed all your comments. Please let me know if you have any follow-up items. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 23:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

@BeanieFan11: and @Gonzo fan2007: All points have been addresssed. Passing the article. Congratulations BeanieFan11 and Gonzo fan2007! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 16:08, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.