Talk:Soviet frigate Rezvyy

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Soviet frigate Rezvyy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 09:42, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

I will do this one.

Lead

• ...the vessel was designed to operate as an anti-submarine vessel in the Soviet Navy...: vessel is used twice in this sentence, suggest something like "the vessel was designed to operate in an anti-submarine role for the Soviet Navy"
  • Good point. Amended.
• with an armament : drop the "an", armament is used in plural form here.
  • Fixed.
• After a major repair: repair implies an accident but there is nothing to this effect in the body of the article. Perhaps it an overhaul/refit?
  • It looks like a refit.

Design and Development

• Probably isn't one, but may as well check: no link for "N. P. Sobolov"?
  • Not yet. That would be an interesting article to research.
• link "dual-role URPK-5": this should be linked here as it is the first mention (it is linked later)
  • Moved wikilink.

Construction and career

• Laid down by on 10 December 1973: looks like a missing word or words here "laid down by NAME?"
  • Oops.
• Rezvyy, along with many of the class, : suggest "Rezvyy, along with many of the other ships of her class,"
  • Good suggestion. Reworded.
• On this trip, Rezvyy, along with the Project 1134A (NATO reporting name 'Kresta II'-class): the Project 1134A/reporting name has already been mentioned in the design and development so it seems repetitive to recite both again.
  • Removed.
• Rezvyy was sent to Shipyard No. 35 in Murmansk to be repaired.: as noted above, this seems to imply an accident of some kind so ideally should be explained. However, I wonder if it was actually a refit?
  • Looking at the source, it is likely a refit. I have clarified this in the text.
• meant that the Soviet Navy was no more.: seems a little colloquial/informal for an encyclopedia, suggest "meant that the Soviet Navy ceased to exist.
  • Happy with the suggestion.
• Rezvyy was transferred to the Russian Navy.: suggest "Rezvyy entered service with the Russian Navy."
  • And again.
• Tromsø in the NATO member Norway.: suggest "Tromsø in Norway, a member country of NATO."
  • And again.
• In general, the career information is a little light but if that is all there is...
  • Yes. The crew seems to have had a remarkably drama-free life.

Bibliography

• The translated title for Apalkov should be title case like the other titles listed.
  • Done.
• For Friedman, just checking "Russian Federation and Successor States 1991–" is the accurate title, the end year isn't missing from the date range?
  • Yes. That is the title.
• Polmar is listed but not cited
  • I have re-added.

That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

@Simongraham:, just checking you have seen the above comments? Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

@Zawed: Thank you for the nudge! Please see my edits and comments above. simongraham (talk) 13:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

This looks good, passing as GA now. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 07:27, 7 March 2022 (UTC)