| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Rifleman 82 (talk) 23:02, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Srabanti Malakar → Srabanti Chatterjee — Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:33, 15 November 2010 (UTC) she known as Shrabanti Chatterjee not Shrabanti Malakar. - Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 17:12, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
BJP
edit@Jim Carter: re: this and this, I'm not sure which portion of my edit summary here you found confusing or objectionable, but as I noted, the content you have submitted twice lacks sufficient context. We do not, by default, mention an actor's political affiliation in the infobox, and the instructions say to do so only if relevant. You've made an interpretive assertion "Actor turning into politician is relevant", yet there is nothing in the article cited that suggests that she is a "politician". Showing support for a political party doesn't make someone a politician. Someone who holds office or who is running for office would be a politician. Since you haven't provided any of that context, you haven't demonstrated how or if this content is relevant. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- I agree. I think we need to wait for some SECONDARY sources to call her a "politician" rather than make it up on our own. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)