Talk:Stenoperla prasina
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
A fact from Stenoperla prasina appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 February 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 09:30, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that a specimen of Stenoperla prasina (pictured) was the 5 millionth specimen digitised by the Natural History Museum, London? Source: https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/news/2022/january/museum-digitises-five-millionth-specimen-unlock-secrets-collection.html
- Comment: I recognise I'm out of DYK article options as I haven't got around to reviewing any. However User:Schwede has said he would donate a review in order for me to nominate this article. See Template:Did you know nominations/Sea rewilding
Created by Ambrosia10 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:19, 19 January 2022 (UTC).
- ALT1 ... that the New Zealand stonefly Stenoperla prasina (pictured) was the 5 millionth specimen digitised by the Natural History Museum in London? Schwede66 03:42, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Looks good - I prefer ALT1 since it's a little clearer for casual readers. Noting the DYK donation from User:Schwede66 (I assume this should be okay). Prosperosity (talk) 23:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Just commenting that I'm very happy for the improved hook ALT1 proposed by User:Schwede66 to be used. - Ambrosia10 (talk)
ALT1 to T:DYK/P3 without image