Talk:Tamil cinema and Dravidian politics
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tamil cinema and Dravidian politics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Tamil cinema and Dravidian politics appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 December 2008, and was viewed approximately 935 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Issues
editThe article looks good enough for a B-gradng. But there are a couple of minor issues, which I feel, could be fixed:
- I personally feel that some of the section headings aren't appropriate. "Dravidian" and "DMK" had been confused in many places. I feel the article could start with a brief history of Tamil cinema and then directly move to the politicization thing instead of having short descriptions of "Dravidian politics" and "Tamil cinema".
- More images could be added. There is only one image for the whole article. The easiest solution is to add pictures of MGR, MK and JJ as these are the easiest to get.
Apart from these minor issues, the article is fine. The article would unquestionably satisfy all the requirements for a "B" grading if these areas are looked into. Anyway, the grade next to "B" is start-class and the article being far far better for a start-class article is closer to being a "B" than a "Start" class article.So, I am assessing it as a "B".-RavichandarMy coffee shop 10:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
The most appropriate rating that could be given for this article is "C". A Start-class article is one which is strong in some areas while weak in others. I feel that this article is better than a Start-class as its coverage is fairly broad. There has been a fairly detailed coverage of the history of Dravidianization of Tamil cinema as well as the politicians associated with cinema and its current trend. However, I have some qualms over the structure of the article, specifically the naming of the different sections. But as Wikiproject India is yet to adopt C-class, I'd rather rate this article as a "B"-RavichandarMy coffee shop 10:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
File:Jjkumar.JPG Nominated for Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:Jjkumar.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:25, 8 November 2011 (UTC) |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Tamil cinema and Dravidian politics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081201110102/http://www.sephis.org/pdf/srinivas4.pdf to http://www.sephis.org/pdf/srinivas4.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)