 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Semi-protected edit request on 12 September 2021
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello, I was closely related to the movie in terms of marketing it. Me along with my colleagues were handling the social media promotions of the movie and the budget of the movie is 65 CR and not 100 CR 103.232.27.178 (talk) 07:56, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:15, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Mixed reviews vs generally positive
editHi @Swiftie1313, Sources do not say "Generally positive" either. The critics section has both + and - reviews. Lets discuss this here why you are adding this. Venkat TL (talk) 10:52, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Critical reception section is getting severely bloated
edit@Swiftie1313, I guess I should give a more detailed explanation for my removal. The Critical reception section is getting severely bloated. I had removed some 5KB of content sourced to blogs and self published sources. Even if the critic is well known and has a Wikipedia page, we should not indiscriminately add all the reviews available out there. A review published in a reliable source is vetted by the editors of the reliable source, meanwhile this second level vetting is not done on blogs and self published websites. That is why I had removed those sources. I see that you have added some of them back. Please suggest ways to reduce the size of this section. content that is not a good value add for the reader should be removed. There should not be duplicate stuff repeatedly said. Venkat TL (talk) 10:52, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Wikispilled Please stop your disruptive edits. Discuss your concerns here. What is your problem with the edits made by @Arjann? I think Arjann's edits are fine. Venkat TL (talk) 13:20, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Box office failure
editThe movie is alreday flopped. Some persons here will write it as sucess also. 157.46.70.1 (talk) 16:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 27 September 2021
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Introduced is spelled wrong in the text, needs to be fixed. 2nd paragraph - In a flashback Jaya is indtroduced as a budding actress, Kbangalore (talk) 10:29, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Thalaivii reviews
editHey Venkat TL, i wanted to talk about this review section. who made this summary? why its not important to add what those critics said about Kangana Ranaut's performance? She's the lead actress of the film and what critcs said about her performance should be mentioned. She got equal amount of praise as Arvind Swami. and why i can't add more reviews from a reliable critics? Also, the film got mixed to positive reviews. Look at this source[1] the website tells us the overall word of mouth of critics based on 14 reviews. - Movie Mafiaa
References
- ^ "Thalaivii Movie Review - Critics". www.addatoday.com. September 10, 2021. Retrieved September 30, 2021.
- Movie Mafiaa, Arjann had written it. Please see the discussion in the thread "Critical reception section is getting severely bloated", above to understand.--Venkat TL (talk) 12:51, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 November 2021
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change Savitri to Saroja Devi for Regina Cassandra’s character. Supprey (talk) 07:12, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Not done: And why should that be done? RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:30, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
OTT revenue
edit@SGiaNaksh We are having a dispute on sourcing. Please stop this edit war and discuss your concerns. Read WP:BRD. Please provide reliable source for this claim by Kangana on OTT. Newspapers are simply quoting her. It is not verified by them. Venkat TL (talk) 11:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- By your logic we don't have a proper source of the budget of the film as well because that budget source is also just quoting Kangana's statement. So you should remove that as well. SGiaNaksh (talk) 11:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Other than that, the thing about the critical response in the lead is also unsourced. from where you're adding words like "half baked" and "overdramatic". Critics just criticised the screenplay and i reworded that properly with a source but you're reverting that as well. SGiaNaksh (talk) 11:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Please WP:INDENT while commenting. The amount is unbelievable. If it is true, I am sure there are reliable sources publishing about this OTT deal. If they aren't then I am afraid Wikipedia should not report this.
- Everything added in the lead is sourced and the reference can be found in the reception section. Please read MOS:LEADREF--Venkat TL (talk) 11:50, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- But then what about the budget? that amount is not believable as well and most of the websites (they're not that notable) reported the budget is approx 50cr to 60cr (source = [1]). But here a source quoting Kangana's statement is valid but not when it comes to the OTT deal.
- and yes I've gone through the source or references already and i can't see words like half baked and overdramatic, the film just drew criticism for its screenplay. also, as per source the response is mixed to positive. SGiaNaksh (talk) 12:04, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Please WP:INDENT your posts, while commenting. What does bollywood Hungama say? Venkat TL (talk) 12:20, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Thalaivi Box Office Collection I All Language I Day Wise I Worldwide". www.sacnilk.com. Retrieved January 25, 2021.
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)