The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 5 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Specifically referring to theseedits. Questions are what this talk page is for. That sentence was a duplicate of a later sentence in the article, inserted into the wrong place, a fact which was made extremely obvious by just having the numbers 9 and 10 in brackets in place of actual citations. As for the apparent contradiction, I flagged it as not being verified by the citations given. Wehpudicabok (talk) 01:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I misread the diff, I was trying to revert to the revision before the addition of that duplicated paragraph. Nardog (talk) 02:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
She did accuse him of rape. Later, possibly after pressure, she modified her later statements. This is a frequent pattern of how accusers of Trump later modify their statements or drop their legal suits against him. In the case of "Katie Johnson" (a pseudonym), her lawyer asserted that she dropped her rape cases (more than one) after Trump allegedly made death threats against her family. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Do you have a source that she “modified” her statements “possibly under pressure”? It seems like Wikipedia is creating their own scenario here. Also, she didn’t modify her statement. She flat out said he didn’t rape her. If not for bias, your explanation would’ve read “she recanted” her statement. WhowinsIwins (talk) 04:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
