Talk:The Fault in Our Stars (film)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Fault in Our Stars (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
The Fault in Our Stars (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 18, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from The Fault in Our Stars (film) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 October 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Fault in Our Stars (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141005184550/http://johngreenbooks.com/questions-about-the-fault-in-our-stars-spoilers/ to http://johngreenbooks.com/questions-about-the-fault-in-our-stars-spoilers/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
this is the saddest movie i have ever seen
editI think this is a very sad movie.I have watched the film and read the book and we r reading it again at school.other than that it is a sad movie.i love both the book and the film Darkcloud1123 (talk) 05:07, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
"Okay" in Release section
editDoes anyone understand what the sentences about the word "okay" mean in the Release section. If read it four times and still have no idea what the point of it is. "Okay" is a standard English word, why does its use bear mentioning? Is the text presuming familiarity with the book/film? Ashmoo (talk) 10:35, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Proposed split
edit- Split The Fault in Our Stars (film) into The Fault in Our Stars (film) and List of accolades received by The Fault in Our Stars. The current article too lengthy for adding accolades and needed multiple nominations. See discussion at Talk:The Fault in Our Stars (film)#Proposed split. 122.174.27.68 (talk) 07:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Agreed, a split would be good. (For reference to others: I think this user was brought here by comments at Draft:List of accolades received by The Fault in Our Stars.) — Bilorv (talk) 17:26, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- WP:SIZESPLIT says "no way at all". Prose size is only 17 kB and neither the overall article nor the accolades section is likely to grow substantially. We don't split just to split. —Joeyconnick (talk) 19:56, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- I support the idea in principle, Accolades tables are ugly, and WP:PROSE is far better but despite being long the table is not as excessively long as the rules seem to require. It's been months, if the split isn't going to happen the tag should be removed. -- 109.76.198.55 (talk) 14:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- WP:SIZESPLIT says "no way at all". Prose size is only 17 kB and neither the overall article nor the accolades section is likely to grow substantially. We don't split just to split. —Joeyconnick (talk) 19:56, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support: The awards list is too long, and longer than many featured lists such as this. Prose can grow if the user tries. --Kailash29792 (talk) 07:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per my above comments (just so we're clear). —Joeyconnick (talk) 21:44, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose the table is way too short. Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 14:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)