The article says that the film lost $270K at the box office. This simply isn't possible. Box office is ticket sales, and to have any number less than zero requires an explanation. It's possible that the film lost $270K total, but there would have been ticket sales, a positive number, and the cost of producing and publicizing the movie, a negative number. Whatever the data was, if all you have is a loss number, then don't call it box office. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:38, 21 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks for pointing this out - colloquially valid, but encyclopedically not. Changed just to "loss", which is what the source describes. Moswento talky 14:48, 21 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
