 | A fact from Tina Stege appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 December 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Image
editvia YouTube and Twitter see here Victuallers (talk) 15:02, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 01:08, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
( )
Tina Stege
- ... that Tina Stege (pictured) who led the High Ambition Coalition at COP26 is from the endangered Marshall Islands? Source: is here
- ALT1: ... that Tina Stege (pictured) who led the High Ambition Coalition at COP26 is from a country which may not exist at projected sea level rises?source:see Guardian ref
- Reviewed: Sky Pool (ironically)
- Comment: image is from a 2017 video (needs a tick from a commons reviewer) Victuallers (talk) 15:17, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Created by Roundtheworld (talk) and FlyingFoxBoi (talk). Nominated by Victuallers (talk) at 16:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC).
Article is new enough. Two correct writers are credited. The article is fully referenced. No copyvio detected. There is a bit of biased POV pushing in Wikipedia voice: "most vulnerable to climate change". This will be something our subject is saying no doubt. And this idea is also reflected in the hook with "endangered". The hook content is referenced and confirmed by the Guardian, apart from the "endangered" bit, which opinion is attributed to Tina Stege. So I suggest that "endangered" is taken out of the hook, or it is reworded so it is clear she is saying that. Hook alt1 is unsuitable as it does not link the article and I cannot tell what it is trying to say in relation to the subject. I can confirm image is CC-BY-3.0 as derived from the video with CC-BY-3.0 license. However I would suggest that a different image is selected from the video, perhaps near the end where the microphone is not obscuring her chin. QPQ is done. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: Thanks for the review Graeme - I have recut a new image. Surprised that "endangered" wasn't referenced. I'm not sure it is just her opinion -"Projected sea level rise would mean 40% of the buildings in the Marshall Islands’ capital of Majuro would be permanently flooded and entire islands would disappear, potentially costing the Pacific country its status as a nation, according to a devastating new report from the World Bank." is a quote from the reference I have added to balance the idea that "endangered" might by pov. Victuallers (talk) 08:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- This new picture is better. Thanks for the screen grab. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: If you are busy then we can find another reviewer. Victuallers (talk) 17:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- What I am asking for is a slightly amended hook to be proposed. I would rather not give the cross as the rest of the article and nomination is good for DYK. If I stick in a hook then we do need yet another to check that out. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: Are you suggesting that we imply that "endangered" is her opinion despite the fact that she represents a nation and the "endangered" aspect is supported by the World Bank and the Guardian newspaper (and the 1bn people estimated to be part of the "High Ambition" group ) saying so? Is there any evidence that is just her opinion and not that of her country and the World Bank? Am I missing something? It you feel you need to give this "a cross" then can I suggest that we ask for a new reviewer?I have suggested an alt that does not use the endangered word. Victuallers (talk) 19:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- What I am asking for is a slightly amended hook to be proposed. I would rather not give the cross as the rest of the article and nomination is good for DYK. If I stick in a hook then we do need yet another to check that out. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: If you are busy then we can find another reviewer. Victuallers (talk) 17:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- This new picture is better. Thanks for the screen grab. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: Women in Red are doing a focus on "Women and Climate" for December - so good to have this for 1 Dec. Could we resolve this? Quite happy to find a new reviewer if you are busy. Victuallers (talk) 11:11, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- New Reviewer please Victuallers (talk) 08:21, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
New reviewer requested. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- New Reviewer please Victuallers (talk) 08:21, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- I think ALT1 is a better hook, but shouldn't it be "led" and not "lead"? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:18, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Good point. fixed Victuallers (talk) 11:04, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
@Victuallers:, Given that "threatened" (which is used in the Guardian article and cited in the Wikipedia article) is one of the top four synonyms for "endangered", I have no problem giving the grammar-corrected alts a green light. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 21:51, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
ALT1 to T:DYK/P7