Talk:Trumpet (ice cream)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 16:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Trumpet ice creams have chocolate tips in the cone due to a measure preventing the cones from getting soggy? Source: https://thespinoff.co.nz/kai/16-02-2024/a-treat-within-a-treat-how-the-trumpet-got-its-chocolate-tip
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/DeeDo
  • Comment: Emphasis must be put on that the tips are not there to prevent sogginess, but are a by-product of preventing sogginess, which can make wording difficult.

Created by Panamitsu (talk). Self-nominated at 09:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Trumpet (ice cream); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• Alt1 ... that chocolate tips in the cone of Trumpet ice creams are a byproduct of a measure that prevents the cones from getting soggy? Suggestion from Schwede66 16:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
• Not a review, but is it really unique to this brand of ice cream? I could have sworn at least some Cornettos also have chocolate tips, at least from what I remember. The hook itself is interesting to me, but I'm not sure if it's unique to Trumpet. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

• You're right, chocolate tips are not unique to Trumpets. —Panamitsu (talk) 09:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

In any case, this is a weird case. I think the hook is interesting, but the fact that it's not unique to this brand gives me pause. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:21, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

• Given the issues with that angle, here are some possible alternatives; they can be reworded if needed.

ALT2 ... that the phrase "togs, togs, undies" was popularized in New Zealand by an advertisement for Trumpet ice cream cones?

ALT3 ... that a 2006 advertisement for Trumpet ice cream cones featured swimming clothing turning into underwear?

ALT4 ... that a 2006 commercial for Trumpet ice cream cones was described as New Zealand's most iconic summer advertisement?

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Also, taking a look at the article, I would suggest the article be given a copyedit. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Narutolovehinata5, I've did a bit of copyediting. With the understanding that you aren't reviewing, is it possible that you have a look over the article? My writing needs improvement. No obligation of course. —Panamitsu (talk) 10:57, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Looks good to me. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:21, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

• Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

• Review

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new enough and long enough. It is well sourced and neutral. No plagiarism detected by Earwig. Hooks 2-4 are interesting. I think Hook 2 is strongest (& I have struck hooks 0-1). ALT2, ALT3 andALT4 are cited here. QPQ is done. Lajmmoore (talk) 09:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)